Hemodynamic Ramp Test in Cardiogenic Shock Supported by Microaxial Flow Pump: Protocol Description, Feasibility, and Hemodynamic Response

Evidence-based protocols for microaxial flow pump (MAFP) weaning remain limited. This study aimed to standardize the ramp test for MAFP and evaluate its feasibility and associated hemodynamic trajectories. In this single-center prospective study, we developed and implemented an Impella ramp test in 54 cardiogenic shock patients who met pretest stability criteria. Forty-six patients (85%) completed the full protocol, while the test was terminated in eight patients according to predefined safety criteria (significant disturbances in arterial pressure or pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP], or sustained arrhythmias), with prompt recovery observed upon returning to the baseline P-level. Under continuous hemodynamic monitoring via a pulmonary artery catheter, the Impella P-level was reduced stepwise from P8 to P2 at 5 minute intervals, while systemic arterial pulse pressure (SAPP), cardiac power output (CPO), and PAWP were recorded. In the overall cohort, SAPP increased by 12.2 mm Hg, CPO decreased by 0.09 W, and PAWP increased by 2.5 mm Hg. Patients supported with Impella 5.5 experienced a greater reduction in flow (-2.8 vs. -1.4 L/minute) and more pronounced hemodynamic changes compared to those with Impella CP. The Impella ramp test is feasible and safe, providing quantitative hemodynamic insights that may inform individualized clinical decision-making and MAFP weaning strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002555
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemodynamic Ramp Test in Cardiogenic Shock Supported by Microaxial Flow Pump: Protocol Description, Feasibility, and Hemodynamic Response

Yuki Ikeda, Shinji Nakahara, Nobuhiro Sato, Yuichiro Iida et al.
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Hemodynamic Ramp Test in Cardiogenic Shock Supported by Microaxial Flow Pump: Protocol Description, Feasibility, and Hemodynamic Response

Yuki Ikeda, Shinji Nakahara, Nobuhiro Sato, Yuichiro Iida, Yu Takigami, Takeru Nabeta, Junya Ako, Yuko Eda, Saeko Iikura, Shunsuke Ishii
article en

Abstract

Evidence-based protocols for microaxial flow pump (MAFP) weaning remain limited. This study aimed to standardize the ramp test for MAFP and evaluate its feasibility and associated hemodynamic trajectories. In this single-center prospective study, we developed and implemented an Impella ramp test in 54 cardiogenic shock patients who met pretest stability criteria. Forty-six patients (85%) completed the full protocol, while the test was terminated in eight patients according to predefined safety criteria (significant disturbances in arterial pressure or pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP], or sustained arrhythmias), with prompt recovery observed upon returning to the baseline P-level. Under continuous hemodynamic monitoring via a pulmonary artery catheter, the Impella P-level was reduced stepwise from P8 to P2 at 5 minute intervals, while systemic arterial pulse pressure (SAPP), cardiac power output (CPO), and PAWP were recorded. In the overall cohort, SAPP increased by 12.2 mm Hg, CPO decreased by 0.09 W, and PAWP increased by 2.5 mm Hg. Patients supported with Impella 5.5 experienced a greater reduction in flow (-2.8 vs. -1.4 L/minute) and more pronounced hemodynamic changes compared to those with Impella CP. The Impella ramp test is feasible and safe, providing quantitative hemodynamic insights that may inform individualized clinical decision-making and MAFP weaning strategies.

ASAIO Journal
E Ink (South Korea) (KR), Ider University (MN), Kitasato University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.