<b>EMPATHY IN HEALTHCARE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONSULTANT DOCTORS' PRACTICES IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC MEDICAL SECTORS</b>

Background: Empathy is a critical component of effective patient care, influencing clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and treatment adherence. Variations in empathy among physicians across healthcare sectors and specialties may impact the quality of care. Objectives:. To assess and compare empathy levels among consultant doctors working in public and private tertiary care hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan, and to examine associations with demographic and professional characteristics Methodology: A cross-sectional study conducted from May-August 2024 in public and private hospitals. Total of 115 consultants participated. Empathy was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE). Demographic and professional data, including age, sex, specialty, and sector of practice, were collected via a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27. Independent-samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA were used, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results: Private sector consultants reported significantly higher empathy scores (M 91.73, SD = 11.07) compared with public sector consultants (M = 85.78, SD = 13.52; p = 0.013). Age was significantly associated with empathy (p= 0.006), with the highest scores in the 35-45 years group. No significant differences were found between males and females (p = 0.572). Empathy varied by specialty (p = 0.047), with dermatology scoring highest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62019/zexdfr17
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EMPATHY IN HEALTHCARE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONSULTANT DOCTORS' PRACTICES IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC MEDICAL SECTORS

Fahad Khan, Aleena Khan, Muhammad Shoaib Khan, Numan Khan et al.
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

EMPATHY IN HEALTHCARE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONSULTANT DOCTORS' PRACTICES IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC MEDICAL SECTORS

Fahad Khan, Aleena Khan, Muhammad Shoaib Khan, Numan Khan, Muhammad Rehan, M. U. Nisa, Wasif Ullah Khan, Saman Fazil, Kashmala Fazil, Suhaib Mesbah
article en

Abstract

Background: Empathy is a critical component of effective patient care, influencing clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and treatment adherence. Variations in empathy among physicians across healthcare sectors and specialties may impact the quality of care. Objectives:. To assess and compare empathy levels among consultant doctors working in public and private tertiary care hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan, and to examine associations with demographic and professional characteristics Methodology: A cross-sectional study conducted from May-August 2024 in public and private hospitals. Total of 115 consultants participated. Empathy was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE). Demographic and professional data, including age, sex, specialty, and sector of practice, were collected via a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27. Independent-samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA were used, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results: Private sector consultants reported significantly higher empathy scores (M 91.73, SD = 11.07) compared with public sector consultants (M = 85.78, SD = 13.52; p = 0.013). Age was significantly associated with empathy (p= 0.006), with the highest scores in the 35-45 years group. No significant differences were found between males and females (p = 0.572). Empathy varied by specialty (p = 0.047), with dermatology scoring highest.

Journal of medical & health sciences review.Vol. 2(3)
Khyber Medical College (PK), Northwest General Hospital and Research Center (PK), Khyber Girls Medical College
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.