How Does Going Public Affect Employee Satisfaction? Evidence from Glassdoor Reviews

We examine how initial public offerings (IPOs) influence employees’ satisfaction with their employers. Using millions of company reviews and a generalized difference-in-differences method, we document that employees become less satisfied after their employers go public. The effect is driven by employees who joined the company before the IPO rather than those who joined after it and is stronger for employees whose tasks relate to regulatory compliance, for smaller firms, and firms with Big 4 auditors at the IPO. The effect is weaker for IPO firms in industries with low environmental, social, and governance (especially social) reputation risk. Using the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act to explore changes in regulatory burdens associated with an IPO, we find that the adverse effect of an IPO on employee satisfaction is weaker for IPO firms that benefit from reduced regulatory burden. Overall, our findings provide novel insights into how going public can affect employee welfare and one potential mechanism behind this effect. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.04285 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.04285
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does Going Public Affect Employee Satisfaction? Evidence from Glassdoor Reviews

Jedson Pinto, Meng Li
Management Science
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

How Does Going Public Affect Employee Satisfaction? Evidence from Glassdoor Reviews

Jedson Pinto, Meng Li
article en

Abstract

We examine how initial public offerings (IPOs) influence employees’ satisfaction with their employers. Using millions of company reviews and a generalized difference-in-differences method, we document that employees become less satisfied after their employers go public. The effect is driven by employees who joined the company before the IPO rather than those who joined after it and is stronger for employees whose tasks relate to regulatory compliance, for smaller firms, and firms with Big 4 auditors at the IPO. The effect is weaker for IPO firms in industries with low environmental, social, and governance (especially social) reputation risk. Using the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act to explore changes in regulatory burdens associated with an IPO, we find that the adverse effect of an IPO on employee satisfaction is weaker for IPO firms that benefit from reduced regulatory burden. Overall, our findings provide novel insights into how going public can affect employee welfare and one potential mechanism behind this effect. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.04285 .

Management Science
The University of Texas at Dallas (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.