https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/7433

Background: Plants have been used for centuries in almost all cultures worldwide as traditional medicines to cure many chronic infections, including viral diseases. In recent decades, scientists have been attempting to scientifically validate the health-improving potential of functional and nutraceutical foods. At the same time, lockdowns due to SARS-CoV-2 had a profound influence on urban foraging behavior. On the other hand, 21 century plant blindness has been well documented. Our hypothesis however was that this is not the case, and that plant blindness, especially in more urban environments, is not a new phenomenon at all. During the curatorial work it became evident that the first director of the collection, CC Gmelin also focused on ethnobotanical topics to improve livelihoods and increase government revenue, publishing a foraging volume in 1817 to remedy the effects of the Napoleonic Wars and the "Summer without harvest" caused by the 1815 Tambora eruption. The pure fact that such a volume was of interest in 1817 seems to proof our hypothesis that plant blindness is by no means a recent phenomenon. Thus, we decided to have a closer look at the volume and to compare the indications given with more recent uses of the respective species. Methods: For this review we used a manual transcript made from using a digital facsimile edition from the British Library. For most recent uses of species we consulted the broader global literature, especially the recent series "Ethnobotany of Mountain Regions". To elucidate if Gmelin indeed referenced the species he promoted, correctly identified the material, and to review the current availability of the species, we reviewed the complete currently accessible spermatophyte, lycophyte and pteridophyte plant collection in KR (about 250000 specimens), and used this resource to elaborate a first preliminary checklist of the Flora of Karlsruhe including vouchered material from 1785 - 2025. Results: Gmelin's 18 century foraging handbook contains 169 species (144 plants, 23 fungi, 2 lichens) belonging to 122 genera (104 plants, 16 fungi, 2 lichens), in 54 families (38 plants, 14 fungi, 2 lichen). Of these 143 are recommended for food, 88 for fodder, and 14 for utensils. All the species had contemporary uses, mostly in Eastern Europe, while only very few have contemporary uses in the original region. The Flora of Karlsruhe has been vouchered since 1785, but despite decades of discussion no preliminary checklist had been published. We take this opportunity of review of Gmelin's "Nothülfe" book to present a first preliminary, voucher based, Checklist of the Flora of Karlsruhe 1785-2025 including almost 2600 species. Discussion: The publication of Gmelin is certainly interesting, because it underlines first, that plant blindness is by no means a problem of the 21. century. Apparently over 200 years ago citizens had similar issues. It is however not entirely clear why Gmelin wrote this volume. Certainly, Carl Christian Gmelin was not only Director of the Natural History Museum and the Botanical Gardens in Karlsruhe, but also Privy Councilor of the Grand Duchy of Baden and published his guide at a time when the still young Grand Duchy of Baden was struggling with particularly serious social, economic, ecological, and political conflicts. What is striking though is that all species that Gmelin mentioned in his 1817 volume are still used in the wider European and Mediterranean region. Conclusion: Our review indicates that "plant blindness" is by no means a phenomenon of the 21. century. Already over 200 years ago, a guidebook was necessary to allow "ordinary" citizens, not only in urban, but also rural areas, the identification of wild plants as food and forage, to remedy years of bad harvests. Herbarium collections are essential to allow for a detailed revision of such publications, and have the potential to elucidate both genetic, as well as metabolic changes in species, e.g. important for food and medicine. The foraging and self-medication craze during and after SARS-CoV-2 underlines the dire need for better taxonomic assessment of plants used by the wider public. Our presented Checklist of the Flora of Karlsruhe 1785-2025 will serve as baseline for future analyses of this urban flora. Keywords: CC Gmelin, foraging, historic plant use, Baden, plant blindness

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnobotany Research and Applications
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32859/era.32.9.1-360
Primary Topic
Legal case studies and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/7433

S. Ozcan, Rainer Willi Bussmann, Péter Müller, Lea Müller et al.
Ethnobotany Research and Applications
Legal case studies and regulations
article

https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/7433

S. Ozcan, Rainer Willi Bussmann, Péter Müller, Lea Müller, Marc Riemann, Carolin Obel, Rainer Petry, Josef Franz, Jonas Bänsch, Lorraine Staub, Laure Bellemann, Audrex Lennox
article en

Abstract

Background: Plants have been used for centuries in almost all cultures worldwide as traditional medicines to cure many chronic infections, including viral diseases. In recent decades, scientists have been attempting to scientifically validate the health-improving potential of functional and nutraceutical foods. At the same time, lockdowns due to SARS-CoV-2 had a profound influence on urban foraging behavior. On the other hand, 21 century plant blindness has been well documented. Our hypothesis however was that this is not the case, and that plant blindness, especially in more urban environments, is not a new phenomenon at all. During the curatorial work it became evident that the first director of the collection, CC Gmelin also focused on ethnobotanical topics to improve livelihoods and increase government revenue, publishing a foraging volume in 1817 to remedy the effects of the Napoleonic Wars and the "Summer without harvest" caused by the 1815 Tambora eruption. The pure fact that such a volume was of interest in 1817 seems to proof our hypothesis that plant blindness is by no means a recent phenomenon. Thus, we decided to have a closer look at the volume and to compare the indications given with more recent uses of the respective species. Methods: For this review we used a manual transcript made from using a digital facsimile edition from the British Library. For most recent uses of species we consulted the broader global literature, especially the recent series "Ethnobotany of Mountain Regions". To elucidate if Gmelin indeed referenced the species he promoted, correctly identified the material, and to review the current availability of the species, we reviewed the complete currently accessible spermatophyte, lycophyte and pteridophyte plant collection in KR (about 250000 specimens), and used this resource to elaborate a first preliminary checklist of the Flora of Karlsruhe including vouchered material from 1785 - 2025. Results: Gmelin's 18 century foraging handbook contains 169 species (144 plants, 23 fungi, 2 lichens) belonging to 122 genera (104 plants, 16 fungi, 2 lichens), in 54 families (38 plants, 14 fungi, 2 lichen). Of these 143 are recommended for food, 88 for fodder, and 14 for utensils. All the species had contemporary uses, mostly in Eastern Europe, while only very few have contemporary uses in the original region. The Flora of Karlsruhe has been vouchered since 1785, but despite decades of discussion no preliminary checklist had been published. We take this opportunity of review of Gmelin's "Nothülfe" book to present a first preliminary, voucher based, Checklist of the Flora of Karlsruhe 1785-2025 including almost 2600 species. Discussion: The publication of Gmelin is certainly interesting, because it underlines first, that plant blindness is by no means a problem of the 21. century. Apparently over 200 years ago citizens had similar issues. It is however not entirely clear why Gmelin wrote this volume. Certainly, Carl Christian Gmelin was not only Director of the Natural History Museum and the Botanical Gardens in Karlsruhe, but also Privy Councilor of the Grand Duchy of Baden and published his guide at a time when the still young Grand Duchy of Baden was struggling with particularly serious social, economic, ecological, and political conflicts. What is striking though is that all species that Gmelin mentioned in his 1817 volume are still used in the wider European and Mediterranean region. Conclusion: Our review indicates that "plant blindness" is by no means a phenomenon of the 21. century. Already over 200 years ago, a guidebook was necessary to allow "ordinary" citizens, not only in urban, but also rural areas, the identification of wild plants as food and forage, to remedy years of bad harvests. Herbarium collections are essential to allow for a detailed revision of such publications, and have the potential to elucidate both genetic, as well as metabolic changes in species, e.g. important for food and medicine. The foraging and self-medication craze during and after SARS-CoV-2 underlines the dire need for better taxonomic assessment of plants used by the wider public. Our presented Checklist of the Flora of Karlsruhe 1785-2025 will serve as baseline for future analyses of this urban flora. Keywords: CC Gmelin, foraging, historic plant use, Baden, plant blindness

Ethnobotany Research and ApplicationsVol. 32
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), State Museum of Natural History Karlsruhe (DE), Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (DE), Institute of Botany (AZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Legal case studies and regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.