Exploring Three Methods for Sampling Oral Microbiota in Older People: A Comparative Study

A variety of methods are described in the literature for sampling oral microbiota, including their advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this study was to assess which method (swab, paper point, and oral fluid collection) for sampling oral microbiota is most favourable for use on a geriatric population. The oral microbiota of geriatric patients who visited the Geriatric Department of the University Medical Center Groningen (The Netherlands), because of memory complaints, were assessed between April 2022 and April 2023. The samples were collected using three methods: swab, paper point, and oral fluid collection. The participants had to have at least one natural tooth. The samples were checked for 11 oral bacteria commonly associated with oral and general diseases. Of the 30 potentially eligible participants, 28 could be enrolled. A 100% bacteria match was achieved by all 3 sampling techniques between 64% of the cases (18/28) and a 91% match between another 25% (7/28). The swab had the highest positivity rate in this population, as it was easy to perform and usable on edentulous individuals, even on those with (severe) disabilities. Overall, the sampling methods showed comparable microbiota in most cases but differed in the complexity of use. The swab seemed to be the most favourable method among the geriatric participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810297
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Three Methods for Sampling Oral Microbiota in Older People: A Comparative Study

Anita Visser, Arjan Vissink, Sanne M. Pruntel, Hanneke de Valk
Applied Sciences
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Exploring Three Methods for Sampling Oral Microbiota in Older People: A Comparative Study

Anita Visser, Arjan Vissink, Sanne M. Pruntel, Hanneke de Valk
article en

Abstract

A variety of methods are described in the literature for sampling oral microbiota, including their advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this study was to assess which method (swab, paper point, and oral fluid collection) for sampling oral microbiota is most favourable for use on a geriatric population. The oral microbiota of geriatric patients who visited the Geriatric Department of the University Medical Center Groningen (The Netherlands), because of memory complaints, were assessed between April 2022 and April 2023. The samples were collected using three methods: swab, paper point, and oral fluid collection. The participants had to have at least one natural tooth. The samples were checked for 11 oral bacteria commonly associated with oral and general diseases. Of the 30 potentially eligible participants, 28 could be enrolled. A 100% bacteria match was achieved by all 3 sampling techniques between 64% of the cases (18/28) and a 91% match between another 25% (7/28). The swab had the highest positivity rate in this population, as it was easy to perform and usable on edentulous individuals, even on those with (severe) disabilities. Overall, the sampling methods showed comparable microbiota in most cases but differed in the complexity of use. The swab seemed to be the most favourable method among the geriatric participants.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(18)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Malden Public Schools (US)
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.