Assessing perceived stress in people with hard-to-heal wounds: case series

Objective: To exemplify assessment of the stress, distress, and coping perceived by patients with hard-to-heal wounds (HHW) receiving treatment in an Enterostomal Therapy outpatient clinic. Method: An observational, prospective secondary study, approved by the ethics committee, involving 10 adult patients with HHW who were followed over two to six consultations. The following tools were used: sociodemographic and clinical data form; Brief Pain Inventory (sensitivity — BPIS; interference — BPII); Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT); Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), which included measures of coping and distress with data expressed as means. Results: Patients primarily had HHW located on the lower extremities, with a mean duration of 21.2 months. The BWAT score was 23.7,the BPIS score was 4, and the BPII was 3.2. Stress was characterized by a total PSS score of 28.5 points, with a distress score of 16.4 and a coping score of 16. In the final consultation, there was a decrease of 4.3 points in BWAT, 0.8 points in BPIS, and 7.6 points in PSS, resulting in a 5.3-point reduction in distress. The BPII increased by 0.7, and coping improved by 2.2. Conclusion: There is a tendency for a relationship between perceived stress and wound healing, with coping influencing the perception of stress. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary, and the potential role of the wound, ostomy, and continence nurse is highlighted for the early assessment of distress and management of coping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Estima
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30886/estima.v23.1692_in
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing perceived stress in people with hard-to-heal wounds: case series

Beatriz Farias Alves Yamada, Carol Viviana Serna González, Beatriz Costa Ferreira, Vera Lúcia Conceição de Gouveia Santos
Revista Estima
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Assessing perceived stress in people with hard-to-heal wounds: case series

Beatriz Farias Alves Yamada, Carol Viviana Serna González, Beatriz Costa Ferreira, Vera Lúcia Conceição de Gouveia Santos
article en

Abstract

Objective: To exemplify assessment of the stress, distress, and coping perceived by patients with hard-to-heal wounds (HHW) receiving treatment in an Enterostomal Therapy outpatient clinic. Method: An observational, prospective secondary study, approved by the ethics committee, involving 10 adult patients with HHW who were followed over two to six consultations. The following tools were used: sociodemographic and clinical data form; Brief Pain Inventory (sensitivity — BPIS; interference — BPII); Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT); Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), which included measures of coping and distress with data expressed as means. Results: Patients primarily had HHW located on the lower extremities, with a mean duration of 21.2 months. The BWAT score was 23.7,the BPIS score was 4, and the BPII was 3.2. Stress was characterized by a total PSS score of 28.5 points, with a distress score of 16.4 and a coping score of 16. In the final consultation, there was a decrease of 4.3 points in BWAT, 0.8 points in BPIS, and 7.6 points in PSS, resulting in a 5.3-point reduction in distress. The BPII increased by 0.7, and coping improved by 2.2. Conclusion: There is a tendency for a relationship between perceived stress and wound healing, with coping influencing the perception of stress. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary, and the potential role of the wound, ostomy, and continence nurse is highlighted for the early assessment of distress and management of coping.

Revista EstimaVol. 23
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.