Exploring pathways to compulsory detention in psychiatric hospital and ways to prevent repeat detentions; Service user perspectives

This study, co-produced by a team of academics, lived experience researchers and clinicians, explores the views and experiences of people who have been compulsorily detained in hospital under the Mental Health Act (1983) (MHA) in England, to understand how and why, from their perspective, compulsory detentions occur, and what might help prevent them. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 people (55% male, 40% Black/Black British, 30% White British) who had been compulsory detained in hospital within the past 5 years. Lived experience researchers with relevant personal experience carried out interviews via telephone or videoconference and participated in analysis of data via a template approach. We derived three over-arching themes from interviews. The first theme "Individual factors increasing or reducing likelihood of being detained" encompassed factors related to people's own lives and attitudes, including life stressors, not taking medication as prescribed, the risk individuals may pose to themselves or others, and their attitude to and management of their mental health. The second theme "Family and Social Network" reflects how attitudes and quality of support from family, friends and social network may contribute to compulsory detentions or help people to stay well. The third theme "Need for improvement in Service Responses" identified limitations of services that contribute to detention, including lack of collaborative care and choice, poor quality of professional support, and discriminatory attitudes from staff. Each theme also included potential approaches to addressing these limitations and reducing compulsory detentions. Findings suggest multiple interacting factors may lead to people being detained in hospital under the MHA, and that improvements to services, such as increasing collaborative care and service user-led family involvement, could prevent further detentions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS mental health.
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000417
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring pathways to compulsory detention in psychiatric hospital and ways to prevent repeat detentions; Service user perspectives

Patrick Nyikavaranda, Jordan Parkinson, Sonia Johnson, John Hardy et al.
1 citations
PLOS mental health.
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
2.31
article

Exploring pathways to compulsory detention in psychiatric hospital and ways to prevent repeat detentions; Service user perspectives

Patrick Nyikavaranda, Jordan Parkinson, Sonia Johnson, John Hardy, Cady Stone, Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans, Henrietta Mbeah‐Bankas, Ariana Kular, Fiona Lobban, Lizzie Mitchell, Lisa Wood, Mary Birken, T Taniguchi Elliot, Kathleen Lindsay Fraser, Janet Seale, Valerie Christina White, Zishi Li, Mark Keith Holden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study, co-produced by a team of academics, lived experience researchers and clinicians, explores the views and experiences of people who have been compulsorily detained in hospital under the Mental Health Act (1983) (MHA) in England, to understand how and why, from their perspective, compulsory detentions occur, and what might help prevent them. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 people (55% male, 40% Black/Black British, 30% White British) who had been compulsory detained in hospital within the past 5 years. Lived experience researchers with relevant personal experience carried out interviews via telephone or videoconference and participated in analysis of data via a template approach. We derived three over-arching themes from interviews. The first theme "Individual factors increasing or reducing likelihood of being detained" encompassed factors related to people's own lives and attitudes, including life stressors, not taking medication as prescribed, the risk individuals may pose to themselves or others, and their attitude to and management of their mental health. The second theme "Family and Social Network" reflects how attitudes and quality of support from family, friends and social network may contribute to compulsory detentions or help people to stay well. The third theme "Need for improvement in Service Responses" identified limitations of services that contribute to detention, including lack of collaborative care and choice, poor quality of professional support, and discriminatory attitudes from staff. Each theme also included potential approaches to addressing these limitations and reducing compulsory detentions. Findings suggest multiple interacting factors may lead to people being detained in hospital under the MHA, and that improvements to services, such as increasing collaborative care and service user-led family involvement, could prevent further detentions.

PLOS mental health.Vol. 2(9)
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), University of Sussex (GB), North East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Centre for Mental Health (GB), Faculty (United Kingdom) (GB), Health Education England (GB), Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB), Lancaster University (GB), Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.