Accuracy of estimating total-tract fibre and protein fractions digestibilities using uNDF, uNDFom, and AIA markers, and their NIRS prediction potential in dairy sheep and goats

This study investigated the use of uNDF, uNDFom, and acid insoluble ash (AIA) markers for estimating the total-tract and total-tract apparent digestibility (ttD and ttaD) of nutrients in dairy sheep and goats fed alfalfa hay and concentrate separately, and the potential of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) in predicting the estimated digestibility. A total of 180 faecal samples were collected from animals fed alfalfa hay and concentrate at varying ratios (F:C - 60:40, 50:50, 40:60). The samples underwent wet chemistry markers and nutrients analysis, to evaluate the digestibility of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), soluble CP, ash, neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), hemicellulose, cellulose, neutral detergent insoluble CP (NDICP), acid detergent insoluble CP (ADICP), and potentially degradable NDF (pdNDF). NIRS spectra acquisition was performed on the same samples and predictive models developed and tested. Compared to digestibility determined by total collection, results indicate that all the considered markers, namely uNDF, uNDFom and AIA tend to underestimate ttaD and ttD. Among the three makers, AIA resulted in the lowest recovery. Using uNDF as marker, NIRS predictive models showed almost adequate screening performance for ttADICPD and ttAshD, with a R²ExV values of 0.63 and 0.59, and RPDExV of 1.56 and 1.45, respectively. The uNDFom marker showed better performance for ttaDMD and ttADICPD preliminary screening, with R2ExV values of 0.55 and 0.62, and RPDExV values of 1.42 and 1.61, respectively. The study highlights that all the considered markers underestimate the nutrients digestibility, while uNDFom performed better concerning the NIRS calibration. Despite the encouraging results obtained, the NIRS accuracy in predicting digestibility traits in small ruminants remains poor, and further research are needed to explore its potential for nutrients ttD and ttaD measurement in sheep and goats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331549
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of estimating total-tract fibre and protein fractions digestibilities using uNDF, uNDFom, and AIA markers, and their NIRS prediction potential in dairy sheep and goats

Federico Righi, Eleni Tsiplakou, Rosario Pitino, Massimo De Marchi et al.
PLoS ONE
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Accuracy of estimating total-tract fibre and protein fractions digestibilities using uNDF, uNDFom, and AIA markers, and their NIRS prediction potential in dairy sheep and goats

Federico Righi, Eleni Tsiplakou, Rosario Pitino, Massimo De Marchi, Alexandros Mavrommatis, Arianna Goi, Marica Simoni, Tommaso Danese, Alberto Guerra, Giorgia Mantovani
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the use of uNDF, uNDFom, and acid insoluble ash (AIA) markers for estimating the total-tract and total-tract apparent digestibility (ttD and ttaD) of nutrients in dairy sheep and goats fed alfalfa hay and concentrate separately, and the potential of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) in predicting the estimated digestibility. A total of 180 faecal samples were collected from animals fed alfalfa hay and concentrate at varying ratios (F:C - 60:40, 50:50, 40:60). The samples underwent wet chemistry markers and nutrients analysis, to evaluate the digestibility of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), soluble CP, ash, neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), hemicellulose, cellulose, neutral detergent insoluble CP (NDICP), acid detergent insoluble CP (ADICP), and potentially degradable NDF (pdNDF). NIRS spectra acquisition was performed on the same samples and predictive models developed and tested. Compared to digestibility determined by total collection, results indicate that all the considered markers, namely uNDF, uNDFom and AIA tend to underestimate ttaD and ttD. Among the three makers, AIA resulted in the lowest recovery. Using uNDF as marker, NIRS predictive models showed almost adequate screening performance for ttADICPD and ttAshD, with a R²ExV values of 0.63 and 0.59, and RPDExV of 1.56 and 1.45, respectively. The uNDFom marker showed better performance for ttaDMD and ttADICPD preliminary screening, with R2ExV values of 0.55 and 0.62, and RPDExV values of 1.42 and 1.61, respectively. The study highlights that all the considered markers underestimate the nutrients digestibility, while uNDFom performed better concerning the NIRS calibration. Despite the encouraging results obtained, the NIRS accuracy in predicting digestibility traits in small ruminants remains poor, and further research are needed to explore its potential for nutrients ttD and ttaD measurement in sheep and goats.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Agricultural University of Athens (GR), University of Parma (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.