Biodiversity Research From an Accountability Perspective: Current Gaps and Prospects for Future Research

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to apply an accountability model to systematically review the biodiversity accounting research published in accounting journals over the last 23 years (2002–2024). An instrument containing a list of questions and sub‐questions addressing four steps of an accountability model—why to report, to whom to report, what to report, and how to report—was developed to systematically review the biodiversity literature with the help of 14 biodiversity experts. A final sample of 98 articles published within 23 accounting journals was reviewed to investigate the accountability focus embodied within the biodiversity accounting literature. In addition to providing useful insights to users, managers, preparers, regulators, and standard‐setters, this study makes a valuable contribution to accounting research by identifying and addressing important gaps in the literature—and therefore important research avenues—with respect to important issues associated with organisational accountability for biodiversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70259
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity Research From an Accountability Perspective: Current Gaps and Prospects for Future Research

Craig Deegan, Damilola Felix Eluyela, Mansi Mansi, Rakesh Pandey
1 citations
Sustainable Development
Environmental Conservation and Management
2.42
article

Biodiversity Research From an Accountability Perspective: Current Gaps and Prospects for Future Research

Craig Deegan, Damilola Felix Eluyela, Mansi Mansi, Rakesh Pandey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to apply an accountability model to systematically review the biodiversity accounting research published in accounting journals over the last 23 years (2002–2024). An instrument containing a list of questions and sub‐questions addressing four steps of an accountability model—why to report, to whom to report, what to report, and how to report—was developed to systematically review the biodiversity literature with the help of 14 biodiversity experts. A final sample of 98 articles published within 23 accounting journals was reviewed to investigate the accountability focus embodied within the biodiversity accounting literature. In addition to providing useful insights to users, managers, preparers, regulators, and standard‐setters, this study makes a valuable contribution to accounting research by identifying and addressing important gaps in the literature—and therefore important research avenues—with respect to important issues associated with organisational accountability for biodiversity.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 34(1)
University of Tasmania (AU)
University of Tasmania
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Environmental Conservation and Management
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biodiversity Research From an Accountability Perspective: Current Gaps and Prospects for Future Research — Craig Deegan, Damilola Felix Eluyela, et al. · Sustainable Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS