Adaptive Hybrid Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Supervised, Reinforcement, and Hybrid Models

Financial fraud detection is challenged by the rarity and evolving nature of fraudulent transactions. This paper presents a comparative study of traditional classifiers (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, SGDClassifier), a reinforcement learning approach (Q-learning), and a novel hybrid model that combines Q-learning-driven feature selection with Random Forest classification. The hybrid framework applies SMOTE selectively to address class imbalance and leverages Bayesian optimization to fine-tune hyperparameters-striking a balance between computational efficiency and detection accuracy. To ensure the reliability of results, experiments were conducted on the Kaggle Credit Card Fraud Detection dataset-comprising 284,807 transactions with only <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{0. 1 7 \%}$</tex> labeled as fraudulent-and repeated across five independent runs, with average performance metrics reported. Among the traditional classification models, Random Forest demonstrated the highest precision (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.9847 \pm$</tex> 0.0109), while Logistic Regression delivered a strong balance between F1-score (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.9093 \pm 0.0160$</tex>) and ROC-AUC (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.9724 \pm 0.00)$</tex>. The Q-learning model, on the other hand, struggled with lower recall (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.7686 \pm 0.0049$</tex>), likely due to challenges posed by the class imbalance. The proposed hybrid approach, which integrates Q-learning-based feature selection with Random Forest classification, achieved an F1-score of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.8916 \pm 0.0894$</tex> and a ROCAUC of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.95 \pm 0.07$</tex>. This reflects a relative improvement of up to 5% in F1-score over standalone Q-learning and demonstrates competitive performance when compared to conventional models. Overall, the findings highlight the hybrid model's potential as a stable and scalable solution for detecting fraud in real time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icctdc64446.2025.11158136
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive Hybrid Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Supervised, Reinforcement, and Hybrid Models

Dilbag Singh, Neetu Gupta
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
article

Adaptive Hybrid Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Supervised, Reinforcement, and Hybrid Models

Dilbag Singh, Neetu Gupta
article en

Abstract

Financial fraud detection is challenged by the rarity and evolving nature of fraudulent transactions. This paper presents a comparative study of traditional classifiers (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, SGDClassifier), a reinforcement learning approach (Q-learning), and a novel hybrid model that combines Q-learning-driven feature selection with Random Forest classification. The hybrid framework applies SMOTE selectively to address class imbalance and leverages Bayesian optimization to fine-tune hyperparameters-striking a balance between computational efficiency and detection accuracy. To ensure the reliability of results, experiments were conducted on the Kaggle Credit Card Fraud Detection dataset-comprising 284,807 transactions with only <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{0. 1 7 \%}$</tex> labeled as fraudulent-and repeated across five independent runs, with average performance metrics reported. Among the traditional classification models, Random Forest demonstrated the highest precision (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.9847 \pm$</tex> 0.0109), while Logistic Regression delivered a strong balance between F1-score (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.9093 \pm 0.0160$</tex>) and ROC-AUC (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.9724 \pm 0.00)$</tex>. The Q-learning model, on the other hand, struggled with lower recall (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.7686 \pm 0.0049$</tex>), likely due to challenges posed by the class imbalance. The proposed hybrid approach, which integrates Q-learning-based feature selection with Random Forest classification, achieved an F1-score of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.8916 \pm 0.0894$</tex> and a ROCAUC of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$0.95 \pm 0.07$</tex>. This reflects a relative improvement of up to 5% in F1-score over standalone Q-learning and demonstrates competitive performance when compared to conventional models. Overall, the findings highlight the hybrid model's potential as a stable and scalable solution for detecting fraud in real time.

University of Rajasthan (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.