Ethical AI for Cybersecurity: A Framework for Balancing Innovation and Regulation

This study introduces an ethical AI-based optimization framework for cybersecurity problems, targeting objectives such as building as much robustness and efficiency of detection as possible while decreasing computational complexity, all without violating ethical principles such as fairness and transparency. With an exploitative side of fast convergence and a contrastingly explorative one of diverse solution search, metaheuristic optimizers such as PSO and GA are incorporated for this framework. Real-world cyberattacks attempt with datasets such as CICIDS and UNSW-NB15 yielded system adaptability to a number of attacks at a mean F1 score of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{F}_{1}=0.92$</tex> under PSO and an extremely elevated robustness metric by GA of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$R(w)=0.18$</tex>. SHAP and LIME explainability capabilities explain model predictions and highlight attributes such as packet size and connection duration as having the greatest influence on the model output. Adaptive learning of optimization parameters (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\alpha, \beta, \gamma$</tex>) equips the framework to be configured for different cybersecurity use cases to allow for tradeoffs between detection performance and adversarial robustness. Thus, this lightweight framework can be readily scaled to large datasets and high-dimensional use cases. Privacypreserving approaches like Federated Learning could go well within this framework, enabling real-time cybersecurity attacks to be fought in tandem with hybrid optimization strategies. These kinds of frameworks would help build secure, efficient, and ethically oriented AI systems where AI has to deal with security issues of the 21st century.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icctdc64446.2025.11158962
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical AI for Cybersecurity: A Framework for Balancing Innovation and Regulation

Krishna Chaganti
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Ethical AI for Cybersecurity: A Framework for Balancing Innovation and Regulation

Krishna Chaganti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study introduces an ethical AI-based optimization framework for cybersecurity problems, targeting objectives such as building as much robustness and efficiency of detection as possible while decreasing computational complexity, all without violating ethical principles such as fairness and transparency. With an exploitative side of fast convergence and a contrastingly explorative one of diverse solution search, metaheuristic optimizers such as PSO and GA are incorporated for this framework. Real-world cyberattacks attempt with datasets such as CICIDS and UNSW-NB15 yielded system adaptability to a number of attacks at a mean F1 score of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{F}_{1}=0.92$</tex> under PSO and an extremely elevated robustness metric by GA of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$R(w)=0.18$</tex>. SHAP and LIME explainability capabilities explain model predictions and highlight attributes such as packet size and connection duration as having the greatest influence on the model output. Adaptive learning of optimization parameters (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\alpha, \beta, \gamma$</tex>) equips the framework to be configured for different cybersecurity use cases to allow for tradeoffs between detection performance and adversarial robustness. Thus, this lightweight framework can be readily scaled to large datasets and high-dimensional use cases. Privacypreserving approaches like Federated Learning could go well within this framework, enabling real-time cybersecurity attacks to be fought in tandem with hybrid optimization strategies. These kinds of frameworks would help build secure, efficient, and ethically oriented AI systems where AI has to deal with security issues of the 21st century.

Center for Global Development (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical AI for Cybersecurity: A Framework for Balancing Innovation and Regulation — Krishna Chaganti · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS