Shingled Magnetic Recording Using HAMR Technology

The two writing architectures that are primarily employed in modern magnetic hard disk drive (HDD) storage devices are conventional magnetic recording (CMR) and shingled magnetic recording (SMR). Although SMR offers higher areal density capability (ADC) compared with CMR, it compromises random access write/read performance. Furthermore, the two main writing processes that are used in hard disk drives are heat assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) and flux control microwave assisted magnetic recording (FC-MAMR). These two writing processes are completely different from each other, with the HAMR method offering higher ADC than MAMR. In this work, we compare ADC between CMR and SMR using FC-MAMR and HAMR drives. Since ADC gain is almost the same in FC-MAMR and HAMR in our design, the highest capacity is found to be achieved using HAMR-based SMR drives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2025.3612965
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shingled Magnetic Recording Using HAMR Technology

Akihiko Takeo, M. Ohtake, Gaku Koizumi, Takuya Maeda et al.
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
article

Shingled Magnetic Recording Using HAMR Technology

Akihiko Takeo, M. Ohtake, Gaku Koizumi, Takuya Maeda, T. Furuhashi, T. Kido, Jianfeng Xiao, Kaori Kimura, Yutaka Tomoda
article en

Abstract

The two writing architectures that are primarily employed in modern magnetic hard disk drive (HDD) storage devices are conventional magnetic recording (CMR) and shingled magnetic recording (SMR). Although SMR offers higher areal density capability (ADC) compared with CMR, it compromises random access write/read performance. Furthermore, the two main writing processes that are used in hard disk drives are heat assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) and flux control microwave assisted magnetic recording (FC-MAMR). These two writing processes are completely different from each other, with the HAMR method offering higher ADC than MAMR. In this work, we compare ADC between CMR and SMR using FC-MAMR and HAMR drives. Since ADC gain is almost the same in FC-MAMR and HAMR in our design, the highest capacity is found to be achieved using HAMR-based SMR drives.

IEEE Transactions on MagneticsVol. 62(3)
Toshiba (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Shingled Magnetic Recording Using HAMR Technology — Akihiko Takeo, M. Ohtake, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS