Safe Bayesian Optimization for Complex Control Systems via Additive Gaussian Processes

Controller tuning and optimization have long been recognized as fundamental challenges in robotics and mechatronic systems. Traditional controller design techniques are usually model-based, and their closed-loop performance depends on the fidelity of the mathematical model. Subsequent tuning of the controller parameters is frequently carried out via empirical rules, which may still suffer from model inaccuracies. In control applications with complex dynamics, obtaining a precise model is often challenging, leading us towards a data-driven approach. While various researchers have explored the optimization of a single controller, it remains a challenge to obtain the optimal controller parameters safely and efficiently when multiple controllers are involved. In this letter, a method called <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SAFECTRLBO</small> is proposed to optimize multiple controllers simultaneously while ensuring safety. The exploration process in existing safe Bayesian optimization is simplified to reduce computational effort without sacrificing expansion capability. Additionally, additive Gaussian kernels are employed to enhance the efficiency of Gaussian process updates for unknown functions. Hardware experiments on a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) demonstrate that, compared to baseline safe Bayesian optimization algorithms, <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SAFECTRLBO</small> attains the best overall performance while ensuring safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2025.3612756
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safe Bayesian Optimization for Complex Control Systems via Additive Gaussian Processes

Lihao Zheng, Prahlad Vadakkepat, Adrish Bhaumik, Xiaocong Li et al.
1 citations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
2.48
article

Safe Bayesian Optimization for Complex Control Systems via Additive Gaussian Processes

Lihao Zheng, Prahlad Vadakkepat, Adrish Bhaumik, Xiaocong Li, Hongxuan Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Controller tuning and optimization have long been recognized as fundamental challenges in robotics and mechatronic systems. Traditional controller design techniques are usually model-based, and their closed-loop performance depends on the fidelity of the mathematical model. Subsequent tuning of the controller parameters is frequently carried out via empirical rules, which may still suffer from model inaccuracies. In control applications with complex dynamics, obtaining a precise model is often challenging, leading us towards a data-driven approach. While various researchers have explored the optimization of a single controller, it remains a challenge to obtain the optimal controller parameters safely and efficiently when multiple controllers are involved. In this letter, a method called <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SAFECTRLBO</small> is proposed to optimize multiple controllers simultaneously while ensuring safety. The exploration process in existing safe Bayesian optimization is simplified to reduce computational effort without sacrificing expansion capability. Additionally, additive Gaussian kernels are employed to enhance the efficiency of Gaussian process updates for unknown functions. Hardware experiments on a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) demonstrate that, compared to baseline safe Bayesian optimization algorithms, <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SAFECTRLBO</small> attains the best overall performance while ensuring safety.

IEEE Robotics and Automation LettersVol. 10(11)
Ningbo University of Technology (CN), National University of Singapore (SG), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN), Ningbo Institute of Industrial Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.