A fusion safety and security analysis framework for intelligent and connected vehicles

Driven by advancements in emerging technologies and data-driven innovations, the global automotive industry is focusing on intelligent and connected vehicles (ICVs), which involve complex electronic systems and vast data interactions. Safety concerns have expanded beyond traditional safety measures to include functional safety, safety of the intended functionality (SOTIF), and cybersecurity. Despite their interconnected nature, current methods often address these domains separately, risking incomplete safety assessments. This paper introduces a fusion safety analysis method that evaluates the three domains collectively. By identifying safety attributes and mapping unsafe behaviors to hazardous scenarios, it quantitatively assesses integrated safety risks. An illustrative case study on adaptive cruise control (ACC) highlights the method's effectiveness, stressing the importance of addressing multi-dimensional safety issues to enhance ICVs safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332050
Primary Topic
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A fusion safety and security analysis framework for intelligent and connected vehicles

Yaoguang Cao, Shichun Yang, Xinjie Feng, Jiayi Lu et al.
PLoS ONE
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
article

A fusion safety and security analysis framework for intelligent and connected vehicles

Yaoguang Cao, Shichun Yang, Xinjie Feng, Jiayi Lu, Zhaowen Pang, Haoran Guang, Yu Wang, Bin Sun
article en

Abstract

Driven by advancements in emerging technologies and data-driven innovations, the global automotive industry is focusing on intelligent and connected vehicles (ICVs), which involve complex electronic systems and vast data interactions. Safety concerns have expanded beyond traditional safety measures to include functional safety, safety of the intended functionality (SOTIF), and cybersecurity. Despite their interconnected nature, current methods often address these domains separately, risking incomplete safety assessments. This paper introduces a fusion safety analysis method that evaluates the three domains collectively. By identifying safety attributes and mapping unsafe behaviors to hazardous scenarios, it quantitatively assesses integrated safety risks. An illustrative case study on adaptive cruise control (ACC) highlights the method's effectiveness, stressing the importance of addressing multi-dimensional safety issues to enhance ICVs safety.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Zhejiang International Studies University (CN), Hainan University (CN), China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CN), Beihang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A fusion safety and security analysis framework for intelligent and connected vehicles — Yaoguang Cao, Shichun Yang, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS