Multi-Agent Q-Learning via Best Choice Dynamics

Motivated by multi-agent Q-learning scenarios, this paper introduces a distributed action selection algorithm that relies on individual agents interacting with local neighbors to learn a joint action. The algorithm, termed Best Choice Dynamics, has each agent communicate its current planned action to its neighbors, who in turn utilize this information to update their own actions. We characterize the convergence and robustness of the algorithm against message losses, showing that it converges to locally optimal joint actions in finite time. We also discuss its relative advantages with respect to message-passing algorithms and best response dynamics regarding convergence guarantees, lack of oscillations, and communication complexity. We illustrate the algorithm performance in various simulation scenarios, including both on-line training and offline training with distributed on-line roll-out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3612969
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Agent Q-Learning via Best Choice Dynamics

Jorge Cortés, Scott Addams
IEEE Access
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
article

Multi-Agent Q-Learning via Best Choice Dynamics

Jorge Cortés, Scott Addams
article en

Abstract

Motivated by multi-agent Q-learning scenarios, this paper introduces a distributed action selection algorithm that relies on individual agents interacting with local neighbors to learn a joint action. The algorithm, termed Best Choice Dynamics, has each agent communicate its current planned action to its neighbors, who in turn utilize this information to update their own actions. We characterize the convergence and robustness of the algorithm against message losses, showing that it converges to locally optimal joint actions in finite time. We also discuss its relative advantages with respect to message-passing algorithms and best response dynamics regarding convergence guarantees, lack of oscillations, and communication complexity. We illustrate the algorithm performance in various simulation scenarios, including both on-line training and offline training with distributed on-line roll-out.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Contextual Change (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.