Тhe choice of surgical treatment for patients with stable angina pectoris

The article presents generalized literature data on the relevance of the problem of myocardial revascularization in patients with angina pectoris. Various methods of surgical treatment of this pathology that currently exist are described, their positive and negative sides are clarified. The effectiveness of open surgical and endovascular interventions in patients with chronic coronary syndrome was compared. It is indicated that the most promising method of treating multivessel lesions in hig-hrisk patients is a hybrid intervention combining the advantages of open and endovascular interventions. The hemodynamic significance of borderline stenosis should be determined by evaluating the functional reserve of coronary blood flow. The peculiarities of choosing one or another method of revascularization based on the generally accepted scale of coronary artery lesion Suntax Score are emphasized. The disadvantages of the existing criteria are indicated and justified

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal)
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2025-103-5-339-345
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Тhe choice of surgical treatment for patients with stable angina pectoris

М. Б. Суковатых, Boris Semenovich Sukovatykh, D. V. Sidorov, N. V. Bolomatov et al.
Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal)
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
article

Тhe choice of surgical treatment for patients with stable angina pectoris

М. Б. Суковатых, Boris Semenovich Sukovatykh, D. V. Sidorov, N. V. Bolomatov, A. V. Sereditsky
article en

Abstract

The article presents generalized literature data on the relevance of the problem of myocardial revascularization in patients with angina pectoris. Various methods of surgical treatment of this pathology that currently exist are described, their positive and negative sides are clarified. The effectiveness of open surgical and endovascular interventions in patients with chronic coronary syndrome was compared. It is indicated that the most promising method of treating multivessel lesions in hig-hrisk patients is a hybrid intervention combining the advantages of open and endovascular interventions. The hemodynamic significance of borderline stenosis should be determined by evaluating the functional reserve of coronary blood flow. The peculiarities of choosing one or another method of revascularization based on the generally accepted scale of coronary artery lesion Suntax Score are emphasized. The disadvantages of the existing criteria are indicated and justified

Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal)Vol. 103(5)
City Clinical Hospital (RU), Kursk State Medical University (RU), Orel State University named after I.S. Turgenev (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Тhe choice of surgical treatment for patients with stable angina pectoris — М. Б. Суковатых, Boris Semenovich Sukovatykh, et al. · Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS