A Data‐Centric Approach to Quantifying the Forward and Inverse Relationship Between Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Parameters and as‐Built Surface Roughness of IN718 Parts

Laser powder bed fusion (PBF‐LB) is an additive manufacturing (AM) technology for producing complex geometry parts. However, the high cost of post‐processing coarse as‐built surfaces drives the need to control surface roughness during fabrication. Prior studies have evaluated the relationship between process parameters and as‐built surface roughness, but they rely on forward models using trial‐and‐error, regression, and data‐driven methods based only on areal surface roughness parameters that neglect spatial surface characteristics. In contrast, this study introduces, for the first time, an inverse data‐centric framework that leverages machine learning algorithms and an experimental dataset of Inconel 718 as‐built surfaces to predict the PBF‐LB process parameters required to achieve a desired as‐built roughness. This inverse model shows a prediction accuracy of ≈80%, compared to 90% for the corresponding forward model. Additionally, it incorporates deterministic surface roughness parameters, which capture both height and spatial information, and significantly improves prediction accuracy compared to only using areal parameters. The inverse model provides a digital tool to process engineers that enables control of surface roughness by tailoring process parameters. Hence, it establishes a foundation for integrating surface roughness control into the digital thread of AM, thereby reducing the need for post‐processing and improving process efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Intelligent Systems
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202500409
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Data‐Centric Approach to Quantifying the Forward and Inverse Relationship Between Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Parameters and as‐Built Surface Roughness of IN718 Parts

Samsul Mahmood, Bart Raeymaekers
Advanced Intelligent Systems
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

A Data‐Centric Approach to Quantifying the Forward and Inverse Relationship Between Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Parameters and as‐Built Surface Roughness of IN718 Parts

Samsul Mahmood, Bart Raeymaekers
article en

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (PBF‐LB) is an additive manufacturing (AM) technology for producing complex geometry parts. However, the high cost of post‐processing coarse as‐built surfaces drives the need to control surface roughness during fabrication. Prior studies have evaluated the relationship between process parameters and as‐built surface roughness, but they rely on forward models using trial‐and‐error, regression, and data‐driven methods based only on areal surface roughness parameters that neglect spatial surface characteristics. In contrast, this study introduces, for the first time, an inverse data‐centric framework that leverages machine learning algorithms and an experimental dataset of Inconel 718 as‐built surfaces to predict the PBF‐LB process parameters required to achieve a desired as‐built roughness. This inverse model shows a prediction accuracy of ≈80%, compared to 90% for the corresponding forward model. Additionally, it incorporates deterministic surface roughness parameters, which capture both height and spatial information, and significantly improves prediction accuracy compared to only using areal parameters. The inverse model provides a digital tool to process engineers that enables control of surface roughness by tailoring process parameters. Hence, it establishes a foundation for integrating surface roughness control into the digital thread of AM, thereby reducing the need for post‐processing and improving process efficiency.

Advanced Intelligent SystemsVol. 8(2)
Virginia Tech (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.