The AI Fetish: When Wooden Brains Begin to Think

This article examines how artificial intelligence has become fetishized in contemporary discourse, being imagined as an autonomous force rather than crystallized collective human labor. Drawing on Marx's theory of commodity fetishism and critical AI studies, the paper analyzes how the apparent agency of AI systems masks their dependence on human labor. It thus challenges individualistic models of intelligence as computation, favoring an understanding of cognition as fundamentally social and historically situated, drawing on authors such as Vygotsky and Ilyenkov. The paper argues that the collective intelligence crystallized in these systems belongs to humanity as a whole, and must be reclaimed, since AI is too powerful for society to leave in the hands of the tech oligopoly. It advocates for a public AI under democratic control, recognizing that the struggle over AI is inseparable from broader struggles against exploitation, for climate justice, and for genuine democracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2025.e108832
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The AI Fetish: When Wooden Brains Begin to Think

Alex Levant
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
article

The AI Fetish: When Wooden Brains Begin to Think

Alex Levant
article en

Abstract

This article examines how artificial intelligence has become fetishized in contemporary discourse, being imagined as an autonomous force rather than crystallized collective human labor. Drawing on Marx's theory of commodity fetishism and critical AI studies, the paper analyzes how the apparent agency of AI systems masks their dependence on human labor. It thus challenges individualistic models of intelligence as computation, favoring an understanding of cognition as fundamentally social and historically situated, drawing on authors such as Vygotsky and Ilyenkov. The paper argues that the collective intelligence crystallized in these systems belongs to humanity as a whole, and must be reclaimed, since AI is too powerful for society to leave in the hands of the tech oligopoly. It advocates for a public AI under democratic control, recognizing that the struggle over AI is inseparable from broader struggles against exploitation, for climate justice, and for genuine democracy.

Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de FísicaVol. 42(2)
Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.