Do Lenders and Donors Value Transparency? Evidence From Financial Organisations in the Social Sector

ABSTRACT Drawing on the information asymmetry perspective, this study examines whether lenders and donors reward the transparency of financial organisations with a social mission such as microfinance institutions (MFIs). Using panel data econometrics on an unbalanced sample of 6338 MFI year observations for 1322 MFIs from 83 countries, our analysis reveals a positive correlation between transparency ratings, subsidies, and private debt. Greater transparency is associated with both market and non‐market financing, as MFIs with higher levels of transparency attract more capital from lenders at below‐market rates. Greater transparency helps MFIs attract capital at lower costs, especially in regulated environments and mature microfinance markets. Moreover, MFIs with high levels of transparency tend to have lower leverage in contexts where loan contracts are well enforced. This suggests that the relationship between transparency and leverage is context‐dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70054
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Lenders and Donors Value Transparency? Evidence From Financial Organisations in the Social Sector

Hubert Tchakouté Tchuigoua
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

Do Lenders and Donors Value Transparency? Evidence From Financial Organisations in the Social Sector

Hubert Tchakouté Tchuigoua
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing on the information asymmetry perspective, this study examines whether lenders and donors reward the transparency of financial organisations with a social mission such as microfinance institutions (MFIs). Using panel data econometrics on an unbalanced sample of 6338 MFI year observations for 1322 MFIs from 83 countries, our analysis reveals a positive correlation between transparency ratings, subsidies, and private debt. Greater transparency is associated with both market and non‐market financing, as MFIs with higher levels of transparency attract more capital from lenders at below‐market rates. Greater transparency helps MFIs attract capital at lower costs, especially in regulated environments and mature microfinance markets. Moreover, MFIs with high levels of transparency tend to have lower leverage in contexts where loan contracts are well enforced. This suggests that the relationship between transparency and leverage is context‐dependent.

International Journal of Finance & Economics
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Lenders and Donors Value Transparency? Evidence From Financial Organisations in the Social Sector — Hubert Tchakouté Tchuigoua · International Journal of Finance & Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS