Ultrasound assessment of the sciatic nerve depth and its relationship with anthropometric parameters

Background & objective: Sciatic nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance serve as fundamental procedures for lower limb anesthesia because they provide better safety and accuracy. The procedural outcome depends on sciatic nerve depth variations which become more significant when patients have high BMI or systemic comorbidities or musculoskeletal abnormalities. The research investigated sciatic nerve depth measurements in the popliteal fossa through ultrasound imaging while analyzing its connection to patient demographics and American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications and anthropometric measurements. Methodology: The research involved 90 adult patients who underwent lower limb surgery with 45 males and 45 females. Researchers recorded demographic information together with BMI measurements and thigh size and leg length data. The popliteal fossa sciatic nerve depth was measured through ultrasound examinations. The research team performed statistical tests that included Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analysis and subgroup comparisons through gender, ASA grade, and BMI category. Results: The ultrasound measurements showed that female patients had deeper sciatic nerves than male patients (3.8 ± 1.0 cm vs. 3.4 ± 0.8 cm; P = 0.03). A positive relationship existed between BMI measurements and mid-thigh diameter dimensions when compared against nerve depth measurements in patients (r = 0.28, P = 0.007 and r = 0.21, P = 0.04 respectively). The independent predictors of increased sciatic nerve depth included BMI (β = 0.06, P = 0.004), mid-thigh diameter (β = 0.03, P = 0.010) and female gender (β = 0.42, P = 0.008) and ASA Grade III (β = 0.37, P = 0.030). The nerve depth increased progressively from normal weight patients (3.2 cm) to obese patients (4.1 cm) with statistical significance (P < 0.001). The study revealed anatomical variations in 57.8% of the patients. Conclusion: The depth of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa shows a direct correlation with BMI and thigh diameter and gender and ASA classification. The results demonstrate why healthcare providers should perform customized preoperative assessments to maximize the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided blocks especially when treating patients with complex body structures or obesity. Keywords: BMI; Nerve Block; Regional Anesthesia; Sciatic Nerve; Thigh Circumference; Ultrasonography; Citation: Shanmugam PK, Mariyappan S, Kumar VK, Gopalakrishna K, Rathnasabapathy B, Choudhary AK, Periasamy P. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(5):352-359. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i5.2874 Received: April 29, 2025; Revised: May 23, 2025; Accepted: June 26, 2025

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v29i5.2874
Primary Topic
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasound assessment of the sciatic nerve depth and its relationship with anthropometric parameters

Vinod Kumar, Brindha Rathnasabapathy, Prem Kumar Shanmugam, Panneerselvam Periasamy et al.
Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
article

Ultrasound assessment of the sciatic nerve depth and its relationship with anthropometric parameters

Vinod Kumar, Brindha Rathnasabapathy, Prem Kumar Shanmugam, Panneerselvam Periasamy, Singaravelan Mariyappan, Aashish Choudhary, K. Gopalakrishna
article en

Abstract

Background & objective: Sciatic nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance serve as fundamental procedures for lower limb anesthesia because they provide better safety and accuracy. The procedural outcome depends on sciatic nerve depth variations which become more significant when patients have high BMI or systemic comorbidities or musculoskeletal abnormalities. The research investigated sciatic nerve depth measurements in the popliteal fossa through ultrasound imaging while analyzing its connection to patient demographics and American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications and anthropometric measurements. Methodology: The research involved 90 adult patients who underwent lower limb surgery with 45 males and 45 females. Researchers recorded demographic information together with BMI measurements and thigh size and leg length data. The popliteal fossa sciatic nerve depth was measured through ultrasound examinations. The research team performed statistical tests that included Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analysis and subgroup comparisons through gender, ASA grade, and BMI category. Results: The ultrasound measurements showed that female patients had deeper sciatic nerves than male patients (3.8 ± 1.0 cm vs. 3.4 ± 0.8 cm; P = 0.03). A positive relationship existed between BMI measurements and mid-thigh diameter dimensions when compared against nerve depth measurements in patients (r = 0.28, P = 0.007 and r = 0.21, P = 0.04 respectively). The independent predictors of increased sciatic nerve depth included BMI (β = 0.06, P = 0.004), mid-thigh diameter (β = 0.03, P = 0.010) and female gender (β = 0.42, P = 0.008) and ASA Grade III (β = 0.37, P = 0.030). The nerve depth increased progressively from normal weight patients (3.2 cm) to obese patients (4.1 cm) with statistical significance (P < 0.001). The study revealed anatomical variations in 57.8% of the patients. Conclusion: The depth of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa shows a direct correlation with BMI and thigh diameter and gender and ASA classification. The results demonstrate why healthcare providers should perform customized preoperative assessments to maximize the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided blocks especially when treating patients with complex body structures or obesity. Keywords: BMI; Nerve Block; Regional Anesthesia; Sciatic Nerve; Thigh Circumference; Ultrasonography; Citation: Shanmugam PK, Mariyappan S, Kumar VK, Gopalakrishna K, Rathnasabapathy B, Choudhary AK, Periasamy P. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(5):352-359. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i5.2874 Received: April 29, 2025; Revised: May 23, 2025; Accepted: June 26, 2025

Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive CareVol. 29(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.