Unveiling global energy inequality through the mismatch between embodied energy and value-added transfer

Global trade in embodied energy plays a critical role in shaping patterns of energy access and equity, yet its implications for energy welfare remain insufficiently explored. This study examines the distribution of energy welfare embedded in trade across 141 countries and regions from 2000 to 2019 by analyzing the divergence between embodied energy transfers and the economic value they generate. The results reveal that imbalances in embodied energy trade have significantly reshaped energy access. Developed economies, such as the US and the EU, benefit disproportionately through energy surpluses in trade. In contrast, emerging manufacturing countries, such as China, and resource-dependent economies, like Saudi Arabia, experience substantial embodied energy outflows. The structure of embodied value-added transfers has also undergone a major transformation, shifting from a centralized configuration to a more diversified and decentralized network. Countries such as China and Russia have emerged as dominant exporters of value-added, while the US and the UK have become major importers. These patterns reflect a global asymmetry in energy welfare, with developed economies positioned at the core of “beneficiary zones” by capturing both energy and economic gains through trade, while less developed economies are often situated in “loss zones,” contributing energy-intensive exports without proportional economic compensation. Moreover, the rise of South–South trade has further exacerbated these inequities. The findings provide insights into the global energy welfare distribution and its implications for trade fairness and equity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Geography
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103778
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling global energy inequality through the mismatch between embodied energy and value-added transfer

Yang Yu, Yuli Shan, Yannan Zhou, Ze He
2 citations
Applied Geography
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
article

Unveiling global energy inequality through the mismatch between embodied energy and value-added transfer

Yang Yu, Yuli Shan, Yannan Zhou, Ze He
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Global trade in embodied energy plays a critical role in shaping patterns of energy access and equity, yet its implications for energy welfare remain insufficiently explored. This study examines the distribution of energy welfare embedded in trade across 141 countries and regions from 2000 to 2019 by analyzing the divergence between embodied energy transfers and the economic value they generate. The results reveal that imbalances in embodied energy trade have significantly reshaped energy access. Developed economies, such as the US and the EU, benefit disproportionately through energy surpluses in trade. In contrast, emerging manufacturing countries, such as China, and resource-dependent economies, like Saudi Arabia, experience substantial embodied energy outflows. The structure of embodied value-added transfers has also undergone a major transformation, shifting from a centralized configuration to a more diversified and decentralized network. Countries such as China and Russia have emerged as dominant exporters of value-added, while the US and the UK have become major importers. These patterns reflect a global asymmetry in energy welfare, with developed economies positioned at the core of “beneficiary zones” by capturing both energy and economic gains through trade, while less developed economies are often situated in “loss zones,” contributing energy-intensive exports without proportional economic compensation. Moreover, the rise of South–South trade has further exacerbated these inequities. The findings provide insights into the global energy welfare distribution and its implications for trade fairness and equity.

Applied GeographyVol. 185
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.