A taxonomy framework and process model to explore AI-enabled workplace inclusion

• AI-enabled inclusion means embedding AI in HR processes to create and sustain inclusive environments. • Inclusion risks rise as AI agency shifts from supporting to automation. • Matching mitigation strategies to AI agency level is key for fairness. • AI-enabled inclusion spans individual (in work) organizational (at work), and human-AI interaction (of work) levels. • Inclusive outcomes require intentional AI system design. This study develops a taxonomy framework and a process model to explain how artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes workplace inclusion through human resource management (HRM) practices. We analyze 25 empirical studies using a hybrid inductive–deductive method informed by Nickerson et al.’s (2013) taxonomy development framework. The resulting taxonomy classifies AI-enabled HRM practices according to their strategic goals, types of human-AI interaction, inclusion typologies, evaluation methods, and mitigation strategies. We extend this taxonomy with a process model that illustrates how different forms of AI agency – ranging from assisting to automating − shape inclusion outcomes and require differentiated mitigation strategies. Our analysis reveals three interconnected dimensions of AI-enabled workplace inclusion emerge in such contexts: inclusion in work (individual experiences), inclusion at work (organizational climate), and inclusion of work (human-AI interaction). Each dimension demands distinct context-sensitive mitigation strategies depending on the level AI agency involved By linking AI agency to differentiated forms of inclusion and tailored mitigation strategies, this study advances theoretical understanding of AI-enabled inclusion. It also offers actionable guidance for organizations implementing AI in HRM practices while safeguarding workplace inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Research
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115697
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A taxonomy framework and process model to explore AI-enabled workplace inclusion

Alessandra Lazazzara, Stefano Za, Andri Georgiadou
4 citations
Journal of Business Research
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
16.81
article

A taxonomy framework and process model to explore AI-enabled workplace inclusion

Alessandra Lazazzara, Stefano Za, Andri Georgiadou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• AI-enabled inclusion means embedding AI in HR processes to create and sustain inclusive environments. • Inclusion risks rise as AI agency shifts from supporting to automation. • Matching mitigation strategies to AI agency level is key for fairness. • AI-enabled inclusion spans individual (in work) organizational (at work), and human-AI interaction (of work) levels. • Inclusive outcomes require intentional AI system design. This study develops a taxonomy framework and a process model to explain how artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes workplace inclusion through human resource management (HRM) practices. We analyze 25 empirical studies using a hybrid inductive–deductive method informed by Nickerson et al.’s (2013) taxonomy development framework. The resulting taxonomy classifies AI-enabled HRM practices according to their strategic goals, types of human-AI interaction, inclusion typologies, evaluation methods, and mitigation strategies. We extend this taxonomy with a process model that illustrates how different forms of AI agency – ranging from assisting to automating − shape inclusion outcomes and require differentiated mitigation strategies. Our analysis reveals three interconnected dimensions of AI-enabled workplace inclusion emerge in such contexts: inclusion in work (individual experiences), inclusion at work (organizational climate), and inclusion of work (human-AI interaction). Each dimension demands distinct context-sensitive mitigation strategies depending on the level AI agency involved By linking AI agency to differentiated forms of inclusion and tailored mitigation strategies, this study advances theoretical understanding of AI-enabled inclusion. It also offers actionable guidance for organizations implementing AI in HRM practices while safeguarding workplace inclusion.

Journal of Business ResearchVol. 201
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Milan (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.