Advanced biomechanics and stability of the resin-dentin complex via modular A- and B-type proanthocyanidins

This study explored the formation and sustainability of the resin-dentin complex optimized by four proanthocyanidins (PACs), modularly defined catechin oligomers with distinct single (B-type) or double (A-type) interflavanyl linkages (IFLs; AA, BB, AAA, BBB). Assessment of their biomimetic potency on the resin-dentin interface [adhesive, hybrid layer (HL), underlying dentin (UD)] involved nano-mechanical dynamic analyses, microtensile bond strength (μTBS), and interfacial micropermeability after 24 h and 6 months in simulated body fluids. The degree of conversion (DC) of PAC-incorporated dental resins was analyzed via ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Bound and unbound water in dentin were measured using differential scanning calorimetry. Statistical analysis employed ANOVA and post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). A-type PACs increased HL nano-moduli (E'<sub>HL</sub> = 15-17 GPa), and all PACs enhanced UD nano-moduli (E'<sub>UD</sub> = 35-52 GPa) versus control (E'<sub>HL</sub> = 10 GPa; E'<sub>UD</sub> = 25 GPa). AA, BB, and BBB PACs increased damping capacity at HL, while reducing it at the UD (p < 0.001). A-type and BB PACs yielded greater bond strength than control. While nano-moduli in the BB group remained stable over 6 months, others declined, although trimers maintained higher E'<sub>HL,UD</sub> than control (p < 0.001). While AA and BB groups sustained bond strength, AAA displayed higher μTBS over time. PACs did not adversely affect DC, whereas A-type PACs increased selectively. Hydric content remained stable post-PAC treatment, except with BB, which reduced total and unbound water. Collectively, PACs stabilized the adhesive interface and enhanced resin-collagen interactions. Notably, A-type PACs yielded more robust and durable interfaces than B-type PACs, with IFL and degree of polymerization modulating bioactive potency at the adhesive interfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomaterials
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123737
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced biomechanics and stability of the resin-dentin complex via modular A- and B-type proanthocyanidins

Shao‐Nong Chen, Mariana Reis, Walleska Feijó Liberato, Ana K. Bedran‐Russo et al.
1 citations
Biomaterials
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Advanced biomechanics and stability of the resin-dentin complex via modular A- and B-type proanthocyanidins

Shao‐Nong Chen, Mariana Reis, Walleska Feijó Liberato, Ana K. Bedran‐Russo, Odair Bim Júnior, Shu-Xi Jing, Guido F. Pauli, Yvette Alania
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explored the formation and sustainability of the resin-dentin complex optimized by four proanthocyanidins (PACs), modularly defined catechin oligomers with distinct single (B-type) or double (A-type) interflavanyl linkages (IFLs; AA, BB, AAA, BBB). Assessment of their biomimetic potency on the resin-dentin interface [adhesive, hybrid layer (HL), underlying dentin (UD)] involved nano-mechanical dynamic analyses, microtensile bond strength (μTBS), and interfacial micropermeability after 24 h and 6 months in simulated body fluids. The degree of conversion (DC) of PAC-incorporated dental resins was analyzed via ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Bound and unbound water in dentin were measured using differential scanning calorimetry. Statistical analysis employed ANOVA and post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). A-type PACs increased HL nano-moduli (E'<sub>HL</sub> = 15-17 GPa), and all PACs enhanced UD nano-moduli (E'<sub>UD</sub> = 35-52 GPa) versus control (E'<sub>HL</sub> = 10 GPa; E'<sub>UD</sub> = 25 GPa). AA, BB, and BBB PACs increased damping capacity at HL, while reducing it at the UD (p < 0.001). A-type and BB PACs yielded greater bond strength than control. While nano-moduli in the BB group remained stable over 6 months, others declined, although trimers maintained higher E'<sub>HL,UD</sub> than control (p < 0.001). While AA and BB groups sustained bond strength, AAA displayed higher μTBS over time. PACs did not adversely affect DC, whereas A-type PACs increased selectively. Hydric content remained stable post-PAC treatment, except with BB, which reduced total and unbound water. Collectively, PACs stabilized the adhesive interface and enhanced resin-collagen interactions. Notably, A-type PACs yielded more robust and durable interfaces than B-type PACs, with IFL and degree of polymerization modulating bioactive potency at the adhesive interfaces.

BiomaterialsVol. 327
Marquette University (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.