Can we protect time series data while maintaining accurate forecasts?

We evaluate the usefulness of protected time series by exploring how privacy protection affects forecast accuracy. Using both simulated and real-world time series data sets, we test various privacy methods, including a proposed swapping-based method ( k -nTS+) designed to maintain time series features, a differentially private method, and an approach based on sharing model weights trained on unprotected data. Based on forecasts from both simple and machine learning models, we find that none of the privacy methods can consistently maintain forecast accuracy at an acceptable level of privacy. We also show that sharing model weights enables accurate forecasts, but accurate forecasts can be used to uncover the identities of protected time series. To overcome these problems, we transform continuous time series into bounded rates to increase the similarities of features, values, and forecasts across time series. This enables our proposed method to produce protected data with a reduction in average forecast accuracy of just 6%. Overall, we acknowledge that except under certain conditions, generating time series with acceptable privacy levels is incompatible with the goal of obtaining accurate forecasts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Forecasting
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.01.001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can we protect time series data while maintaining accurate forecasts?

Cameron D. Bale, Matthew J. Schneider, Jinwook Lee
2 citations
International Journal of Forecasting
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
4.21
article

Can we protect time series data while maintaining accurate forecasts?

Cameron D. Bale, Matthew J. Schneider, Jinwook Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We evaluate the usefulness of protected time series by exploring how privacy protection affects forecast accuracy. Using both simulated and real-world time series data sets, we test various privacy methods, including a proposed swapping-based method ( k -nTS+) designed to maintain time series features, a differentially private method, and an approach based on sharing model weights trained on unprotected data. Based on forecasts from both simple and machine learning models, we find that none of the privacy methods can consistently maintain forecast accuracy at an acceptable level of privacy. We also show that sharing model weights enables accurate forecasts, but accurate forecasts can be used to uncover the identities of protected time series. To overcome these problems, we transform continuous time series into bounded rates to increase the similarities of features, values, and forecasts across time series. This enables our proposed method to produce protected data with a reduction in average forecast accuracy of just 6%. Overall, we acknowledge that except under certain conditions, generating time series with acceptable privacy levels is incompatible with the goal of obtaining accurate forecasts.

International Journal of ForecastingVol. 42(2)
Brigham Young University (US), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.