24-Hour Movement Behaviours and Considerations of Disability: An Updated Review of Child Care Legislation in Canada

Abstract Introduction Child care is the primary environment in which many young children spend their time outside the family in Canada, and as such, plays an important role in supporting healthy movement behaviours. This population, including children with a disability, is consistently noted to attend child care and report lower rates of meeting movement behaviour recommendations. This updated review aimed to re-examine the provincial/territorial legislature in relation to physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviours (SB; screen time), and sleep, while also examining the inclusion of children with a disability therein. Methods Child care acts and regulations for each province/territory were collected and reviewed with a focus on PA, SB (screen time), play, outdoor time, sleep, and inclusion/disability. Comparisons across provinces/territories were conducted identifying frequencies and commonalities within the regulations. Results All provinces/territories provide general recommendations to afford gross motor movement; but the majority (83%) give no specific requirements for how long or at what intensity. Only 4 provinces (British Columbia, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Nova Scotia) explicitly mentioned PA, while all required daily outdoor play. British Columbia, New Brunswick, and Quebec mentioned SB, with the latter two explicitly noting no screen time. Only British Columbia referenced the 24-Hour Movement Behaviour Guidelines. Five provinces/territories mentioned children with disabilities in their legislation (but only three spoke specifically to inclusion regarding movement behaviours). Conclusion Variability in child care legislation specific to movement behaviours was observed. Providing high-level targets for movement behaviours by way of provincial/territorial legislation would give child care staff a baseline from which to begin supporting more active behaviours among all enrolled children. Moreover, there was no guidance offered for meaningful inclusion of children with disabilities. Future research is needed to support translating PA policies into improved movement behaviours among all young children in child care, including children with disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of child care and education policy/International journal of child care and education
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-025-00158-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

24-Hour Movement Behaviours and Considerations of Disability: An Updated Review of Child Care Legislation in Canada

Patricia Tucker, Leigh M. Vanderloo, Brianne A. Bruijns, Sarah Carsley et al.
1 citations
International journal of child care and education policy/International journal of child care and education
Early Childhood Education and Development
8.93
article

24-Hour Movement Behaviours and Considerations of Disability: An Updated Review of Child Care Legislation in Canada

Patricia Tucker, Leigh M. Vanderloo, Brianne A. Bruijns, Sarah Carsley, Alexandra A. Puchiele
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Child care is the primary environment in which many young children spend their time outside the family in Canada, and as such, plays an important role in supporting healthy movement behaviours. This population, including children with a disability, is consistently noted to attend child care and report lower rates of meeting movement behaviour recommendations. This updated review aimed to re-examine the provincial/territorial legislature in relation to physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviours (SB; screen time), and sleep, while also examining the inclusion of children with a disability therein. Methods Child care acts and regulations for each province/territory were collected and reviewed with a focus on PA, SB (screen time), play, outdoor time, sleep, and inclusion/disability. Comparisons across provinces/territories were conducted identifying frequencies and commonalities within the regulations. Results All provinces/territories provide general recommendations to afford gross motor movement; but the majority (83%) give no specific requirements for how long or at what intensity. Only 4 provinces (British Columbia, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Nova Scotia) explicitly mentioned PA, while all required daily outdoor play. British Columbia, New Brunswick, and Quebec mentioned SB, with the latter two explicitly noting no screen time. Only British Columbia referenced the 24-Hour Movement Behaviour Guidelines. Five provinces/territories mentioned children with disabilities in their legislation (but only three spoke specifically to inclusion regarding movement behaviours). Conclusion Variability in child care legislation specific to movement behaviours was observed. Providing high-level targets for movement behaviours by way of provincial/territorial legislation would give child care staff a baseline from which to begin supporting more active behaviours among all enrolled children. Moreover, there was no guidance offered for meaningful inclusion of children with disabilities. Future research is needed to support translating PA policies into improved movement behaviours among all young children in child care, including children with disabilities.

International journal of child care and education policy/International journal of child care and educationVol. 19(1)
Western University (CA), Lawson Health Research Institute (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA), Children’s Health Research Institute (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Early Childhood Education and Development
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.