Impact of abandoned land restoration on ecosystem services: a systematic review

The degradation of abandoned land has emerged as a global concern, with profound implications for ecosystem services and human well-being. These lands—ranging from agricultural fallows to mining sites and urban derelict areas—commonly experience soil fertility decline, biodiversity loss, and diminished water regulation capacity. Appropriate restoration interventions, including vegetation succession, afforestation, soil amendments, and hydrological rehabilitation, can restore ecological functions and enhance the supply of ecosystem services. However, systematic assessments of these outcomes remain limited. This review synthesizes evidence on the effects of abandoned land restoration on ecosystem services. Empirical evidence demonstrates that restoration enhances provisioning services (e.g., food, timber, biomass energy), regulating services (e.g., carbon sequestration, soil retention, water purification, climate moderation), and cultural services (e.g., recreation, aesthetics, education). Nevertheless, trade-offs emerge, such as reduced water availability from afforestation or biodiversity loss under monoculture bioenergy plantations. These outcomes vary according to spatial heterogeneity, restoration strategies, socioeconomic contexts, and external pressures. Furthermore, some interventions yield short-term benefits but entail long-term uncertainties regarding sustainability and ecological resilience. Our synthesis underscores both opportunities and challenges. While abandoned land restoration has substantial potential to enhance ecosystem services, critical gaps remain, including limited data availability, insufficient long-term monitoring, and weak integration of socioeconomic dimensions. Future research priorities include (i) improving long-term ecological impact assessments; (ii) refining analyses of synergies and trade-offs among multiple services; (iii) integrating socioeconomic and policy dimensions into restoration frameworks; and (iv) advancing modeling and decision-support systems under future climate and land-use scenarios. Ultimately, coordinated monitoring, innovative technologies, and adaptive policy frameworks are indispensable for fully realizing the ecological and social benefits of abandoned land restoration within sustainable land management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Reviews
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2025-0130
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of abandoned land restoration on ecosystem services: a systematic review

Yajun Jian, Huiqing Han, Geng Ma, Guangbin Yang
1 citations
Environmental Reviews
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
article

Impact of abandoned land restoration on ecosystem services: a systematic review

Yajun Jian, Huiqing Han, Geng Ma, Guangbin Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The degradation of abandoned land has emerged as a global concern, with profound implications for ecosystem services and human well-being. These lands—ranging from agricultural fallows to mining sites and urban derelict areas—commonly experience soil fertility decline, biodiversity loss, and diminished water regulation capacity. Appropriate restoration interventions, including vegetation succession, afforestation, soil amendments, and hydrological rehabilitation, can restore ecological functions and enhance the supply of ecosystem services. However, systematic assessments of these outcomes remain limited. This review synthesizes evidence on the effects of abandoned land restoration on ecosystem services. Empirical evidence demonstrates that restoration enhances provisioning services (e.g., food, timber, biomass energy), regulating services (e.g., carbon sequestration, soil retention, water purification, climate moderation), and cultural services (e.g., recreation, aesthetics, education). Nevertheless, trade-offs emerge, such as reduced water availability from afforestation or biodiversity loss under monoculture bioenergy plantations. These outcomes vary according to spatial heterogeneity, restoration strategies, socioeconomic contexts, and external pressures. Furthermore, some interventions yield short-term benefits but entail long-term uncertainties regarding sustainability and ecological resilience. Our synthesis underscores both opportunities and challenges. While abandoned land restoration has substantial potential to enhance ecosystem services, critical gaps remain, including limited data availability, insufficient long-term monitoring, and weak integration of socioeconomic dimensions. Future research priorities include (i) improving long-term ecological impact assessments; (ii) refining analyses of synergies and trade-offs among multiple services; (iii) integrating socioeconomic and policy dimensions into restoration frameworks; and (iv) advancing modeling and decision-support systems under future climate and land-use scenarios. Ultimately, coordinated monitoring, innovative technologies, and adaptive policy frameworks are indispensable for fully realizing the ecological and social benefits of abandoned land restoration within sustainable land management.

Environmental ReviewsVol. 33
Guizhou Normal University (CN), Guizhou Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.