Accuracy of vital sign monitoring using a photoplethysmography upper arm wearable device in postoperative non-cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational clinical validation study

Vital sign monitoring in patients is essential for the early detection of deterioration of vital signs and timely medical intervention especially on general wards in hospitals. Traditionally performed manually and intermittently, wearable monitoring devices offer a promising alternative by automatically providing real-time, continuous data. In this prospective observational study in non-cardiac surgery patients, we aim to evaluate the accuracy of respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) measurements obtained from a photoplethysmography (PPG)-based upper arm wearable device viQtor® (smartQare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands), by simultaneously comparing its readings with standard monitoring equipment in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Capnography was included as the gold-standard reference for RR. Agreement between the wearable and reference measurements were assessed using Bland–Altman analyses. Clinical accuracy was evaluated using Clarke Error Grid analyses. Vital sign data were collected from 42 postoperative patients (age: 65.5 years [IQR 37.4–74.7]; BMI: 24.1 kg/m2 [IQR 21.7–26.9]) over a median duration of 14.0 hours. The Average Root Mean Square (ARMS) between the wearable device and the reference for RR was 2.85 BRPM, with a bias of -0.40 (95% LoA –5.85 to 5.04); for HR 2.01 BPM, with a bias of 0.08 (95% LoA -3.83 to 3.99); and for SpO2 2.08%, with a bias of –0.03 (95% LoA –4.14 to 4.09). The viQtor® device demonstrated high accuracy for RR, HR, and SpO₂ in postoperative patients. Data availability was high across all three parameters, and patient satisfaction was excellent. These findings support its potential for continuous monitoring on general wards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01358-z
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of vital sign monitoring using a photoplethysmography upper arm wearable device in postoperative non-cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational clinical validation study

Eric E.C. de Waal, Noa Reijmers, Arthur van Kootwijk
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
2.02
article

Accuracy of vital sign monitoring using a photoplethysmography upper arm wearable device in postoperative non-cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational clinical validation study

Eric E.C. de Waal, Noa Reijmers, Arthur van Kootwijk
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Vital sign monitoring in patients is essential for the early detection of deterioration of vital signs and timely medical intervention especially on general wards in hospitals. Traditionally performed manually and intermittently, wearable monitoring devices offer a promising alternative by automatically providing real-time, continuous data. In this prospective observational study in non-cardiac surgery patients, we aim to evaluate the accuracy of respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) measurements obtained from a photoplethysmography (PPG)-based upper arm wearable device viQtor® (smartQare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands), by simultaneously comparing its readings with standard monitoring equipment in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Capnography was included as the gold-standard reference for RR. Agreement between the wearable and reference measurements were assessed using Bland–Altman analyses. Clinical accuracy was evaluated using Clarke Error Grid analyses. Vital sign data were collected from 42 postoperative patients (age: 65.5 years [IQR 37.4–74.7]; BMI: 24.1 kg/m2 [IQR 21.7–26.9]) over a median duration of 14.0 hours. The Average Root Mean Square (ARMS) between the wearable device and the reference for RR was 2.85 BRPM, with a bias of -0.40 (95% LoA –5.85 to 5.04); for HR 2.01 BPM, with a bias of 0.08 (95% LoA -3.83 to 3.99); and for SpO2 2.08%, with a bias of –0.03 (95% LoA –4.14 to 4.09). The viQtor® device demonstrated high accuracy for RR, HR, and SpO₂ in postoperative patients. Data availability was high across all three parameters, and patient satisfaction was excellent. These findings support its potential for continuous monitoring on general wards.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.