Diagenetic Facies Division of Different Types of Sandstone Reservoirs and Their Differentiation

In response to the increasing proportion of low-porosity, low-permeability, and tight sandstone reservoirs in current oil and gas exploration, this paper conducts a systematic study on diagenetic facies division. First, the development stages and existing problems of diagenetic facies research are reviewed, with an emphasis on the objective of establishing a scientific classification system. The study highlights the core criteria for facies division, including types and intensities of diagenesis, petrographic characteristics, pore and petrophysical features, as well as logging responses and quantitative models. Differentiated emphasis is proposed for reservoirs of different types. Finally, a general methodological framework is constructed, progressing “from micro to macro, from qualitative to quantitative,” providing systematic ideas and methodological support for diagenetic facies research and favorable zone prediction in various types of reservoirs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Journal of Technology
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/zh8vy043
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagenetic Facies Division of Different Types of Sandstone Reservoirs and Their Differentiation

David Zhang
Scientific Journal of Technology
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Diagenetic Facies Division of Different Types of Sandstone Reservoirs and Their Differentiation

David Zhang
article en

Abstract

In response to the increasing proportion of low-porosity, low-permeability, and tight sandstone reservoirs in current oil and gas exploration, this paper conducts a systematic study on diagenetic facies division. First, the development stages and existing problems of diagenetic facies research are reviewed, with an emphasis on the objective of establishing a scientific classification system. The study highlights the core criteria for facies division, including types and intensities of diagenesis, petrographic characteristics, pore and petrophysical features, as well as logging responses and quantitative models. Differentiated emphasis is proposed for reservoirs of different types. Finally, a general methodological framework is constructed, progressing “from micro to macro, from qualitative to quantitative,” providing systematic ideas and methodological support for diagenetic facies research and favorable zone prediction in various types of reservoirs.

Scientific Journal of TechnologyVol. 7(9)
Xi'an Shiyou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagenetic Facies Division of Different Types of Sandstone Reservoirs and Their Differentiation — David Zhang · Scientific Journal of Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS