Research on the Quantitative Evaluation and Methods of Drilling Overflow Risk Based on While-Drilling Information

In order to solve the problems of insufficient generalisation ability and poor interpretability of evaluation results in the complex geological environment of the current data-driven overflow risk assessment model, this paper proposes a quantitative overflow risk assessment method based on the combination of CNN-LSTM data-driven model and fuzzy reasoning system. The data features were extracted, the overflow risk was predicted, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was further adopted, the membership function was generated based on the normal distribution fitting historical data, the risk probability threshold was dynamically calibrated, the risk was refined into low, medium and high levels, and the expert experience was integrated through fuzzy reasoning rules to improve the transparency and flexibility of overflow risk assessment. The experimental results show that the accuracy of the proposed method is 99.95%, and the false alarm rate is only 0.5%, which significantly improves the adaptability and reliability of risk assessment compared with the traditional static threshold method, and enhances the interpretability of the model through feature visualisation and dynamic rules, which provides intelligent decision support with both high precision and strong robustness for drilling safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Journal of Technology
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/rhz8ht59
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the Quantitative Evaluation and Methods of Drilling Overflow Risk Based on While-Drilling Information

Yang Hu
Scientific Journal of Technology
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Research on the Quantitative Evaluation and Methods of Drilling Overflow Risk Based on While-Drilling Information

Yang Hu
article en

Abstract

In order to solve the problems of insufficient generalisation ability and poor interpretability of evaluation results in the complex geological environment of the current data-driven overflow risk assessment model, this paper proposes a quantitative overflow risk assessment method based on the combination of CNN-LSTM data-driven model and fuzzy reasoning system. The data features were extracted, the overflow risk was predicted, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was further adopted, the membership function was generated based on the normal distribution fitting historical data, the risk probability threshold was dynamically calibrated, the risk was refined into low, medium and high levels, and the expert experience was integrated through fuzzy reasoning rules to improve the transparency and flexibility of overflow risk assessment. The experimental results show that the accuracy of the proposed method is 99.95%, and the false alarm rate is only 0.5%, which significantly improves the adaptability and reliability of risk assessment compared with the traditional static threshold method, and enhances the interpretability of the model through feature visualisation and dynamic rules, which provides intelligent decision support with both high precision and strong robustness for drilling safety.

Scientific Journal of TechnologyVol. 7(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on the Quantitative Evaluation and Methods of Drilling Overflow Risk Based on While-Drilling Information — Yang Hu · Scientific Journal of Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS