GNSS-based synchronization and monitoring of LEO-PNT onboard time

For best interoperability, navigation signals transmitted by a positioning, navigation, and timing system in low Earth orbit (LEO-PNT) should be synchronized to the system time scale of an existing GNSS, such as GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou or the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Even though an end-to-end assessment of inter-system time offsets can, in principle, be performed based on the analysis of LEO-PNT and GNSS ranging measurements from a joint receiver on ground, this concept lumps multiple error sources and provides only limited insight into the individual contributions. Subject to availability of a GNSS receiver onboard the LEO-PNT satellites, the principle of GNSS time transfer may be used as an alternative to directly determine the difference between the onboard time and a reference GNSS or UTC time scale. The technical requirements for this form of time synchronization are outlined and the individual analysis steps including precise orbit determination (POD) of the LEO satellite and precise point positioning (PPP) processing of GNSS measurements from a timing laboratory are described. For illustration, GNSS measurements from the Sentinel-6A satellite are processed offline in a reference implementation of a real-time navigation system. The resulting “onboard” time scale is then compared to UTC and Galileo System time. Using two fully independent POD/PPP implementations a better than 0.05ns consistency is demonstrated for the space-to-ground time transfer, which characterizes the achievable precision of the LEO-PNT onboard time monitoring. Making use of Galileo and GPS broadcast ephemerides, the sample Sentinel-6A navigation system is shown to provide an onboard time synchronized to Galileo System Time with RMS errors of 0.75ns (23cm) over a continuous 10-day test period. For comparison, 3D RMS position errors of about 9cm are obtained relative to a precise reference trajectory. The different performance of the onboard time and position determination is mainly attributed to the correlation of clock offsets and carrier phase ambiguities in the real-time navigation filter and appears as a limiting factor for the achievable onboard time synchronization accuracy using GNSS without complementary augmentation data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Space Research
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.09.047
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GNSS-based synchronization and monitoring of LEO-PNT onboard time

Florian Kunzi, Francesco Gini, Oliver Montenbruck, Miguel Cordero Limón et al.
Advances in Space Research
GNSS positioning and interference
article

GNSS-based synchronization and monitoring of LEO-PNT onboard time

Florian Kunzi, Francesco Gini, Oliver Montenbruck, Miguel Cordero Limón, Filipe De Oliveira Salgueiro
article en

Abstract

For best interoperability, navigation signals transmitted by a positioning, navigation, and timing system in low Earth orbit (LEO-PNT) should be synchronized to the system time scale of an existing GNSS, such as GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou or the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Even though an end-to-end assessment of inter-system time offsets can, in principle, be performed based on the analysis of LEO-PNT and GNSS ranging measurements from a joint receiver on ground, this concept lumps multiple error sources and provides only limited insight into the individual contributions. Subject to availability of a GNSS receiver onboard the LEO-PNT satellites, the principle of GNSS time transfer may be used as an alternative to directly determine the difference between the onboard time and a reference GNSS or UTC time scale. The technical requirements for this form of time synchronization are outlined and the individual analysis steps including precise orbit determination (POD) of the LEO satellite and precise point positioning (PPP) processing of GNSS measurements from a timing laboratory are described. For illustration, GNSS measurements from the Sentinel-6A satellite are processed offline in a reference implementation of a real-time navigation system. The resulting “onboard” time scale is then compared to UTC and Galileo System time. Using two fully independent POD/PPP implementations a better than 0.05ns consistency is demonstrated for the space-to-ground time transfer, which characterizes the achievable precision of the LEO-PNT onboard time monitoring. Making use of Galileo and GPS broadcast ephemerides, the sample Sentinel-6A navigation system is shown to provide an onboard time synchronized to Galileo System Time with RMS errors of 0.75ns (23cm) over a continuous 10-day test period. For comparison, 3D RMS position errors of about 9cm are obtained relative to a precise reference trajectory. The different performance of the onboard time and position determination is mainly attributed to the correlation of clock offsets and carrier phase ambiguities in the real-time navigation filter and appears as a limiting factor for the achievable onboard time synchronization accuracy using GNSS without complementary augmentation data.

Advances in Space ResearchVol. 76(11)
European Space Operations Centre (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL), Robert Bosch (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.