Viscera Preservation in Medical Board Autopsies: Timelines, Outcomes, and Systemic Inefficiencies in Toxicological Analysis

Background Viscera preservation for toxicological analysis is a standard practice in medicolegal autopsies, yet its forensic and judicial value amidst delayed evaluations remains contested. This study investigates the impact of such delays on the relevance of toxicological findings, examining the frequency of positive results in relation to report turnaround times. By describing patterns of viscera preservation and toxicological reporting timelines, the research intends to highlight practical challenges and inefficiencies, providing a foundation for evidence-based improvements in forensic protocols. Methodology A retrospective observational study was executed, scrutinizing records of medicolegal autopsies performed by medical boards from April 2015 to March 2020. Information regarding the preservation of visceral organs, timeframes for dispatch, and the receipt of toxicological reports was meticulously gathered. Statistical evaluations were conducted to study the correlation between delays in reporting and toxicological outcomes. Results Considerable delays were noted in the processes of dispatching preserved viscera and obtaining toxicology reports; a mere 22% of reports were acquired within a six-month period, while 42.5% extended beyond a year. A chi-square statistical analysis indicated a significant relationship (p = 0.039) between extended delays and negative toxicological outcomes. Around 76.9% of the reports yielded negative results, with the presence of ethyl alcohol contaminated by methyl alcohol representing the predominant positive finding (13.5%). Conclusion Systemic deficiencies in the preservation of visceral organs and the subsequent toxicological assessment significantly compromise forensic efficacy. A more discerning methodology for preservation, augmented inter-agency collaboration, and innovations in forensic technologies are imperative for enhancing operational efficiency and dependability, along with facilitating prompt and precise toxicological evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92886
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Viscera Preservation in Medical Board Autopsies: Timelines, Outcomes, and Systemic Inefficiencies in Toxicological Analysis

Amit Bhagat, Kumar Shubhendu, Sawan Mundri, Ankur Chaudhary et al.
Cureus
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

Viscera Preservation in Medical Board Autopsies: Timelines, Outcomes, and Systemic Inefficiencies in Toxicological Analysis

Amit Bhagat, Kumar Shubhendu, Sawan Mundri, Ankur Chaudhary, Anand Kumar
article en

Abstract

Background Viscera preservation for toxicological analysis is a standard practice in medicolegal autopsies, yet its forensic and judicial value amidst delayed evaluations remains contested. This study investigates the impact of such delays on the relevance of toxicological findings, examining the frequency of positive results in relation to report turnaround times. By describing patterns of viscera preservation and toxicological reporting timelines, the research intends to highlight practical challenges and inefficiencies, providing a foundation for evidence-based improvements in forensic protocols. Methodology A retrospective observational study was executed, scrutinizing records of medicolegal autopsies performed by medical boards from April 2015 to March 2020. Information regarding the preservation of visceral organs, timeframes for dispatch, and the receipt of toxicological reports was meticulously gathered. Statistical evaluations were conducted to study the correlation between delays in reporting and toxicological outcomes. Results Considerable delays were noted in the processes of dispatching preserved viscera and obtaining toxicology reports; a mere 22% of reports were acquired within a six-month period, while 42.5% extended beyond a year. A chi-square statistical analysis indicated a significant relationship (p = 0.039) between extended delays and negative toxicological outcomes. Around 76.9% of the reports yielded negative results, with the presence of ethyl alcohol contaminated by methyl alcohol representing the predominant positive finding (13.5%). Conclusion Systemic deficiencies in the preservation of visceral organs and the subsequent toxicological assessment significantly compromise forensic efficacy. A more discerning methodology for preservation, augmented inter-agency collaboration, and innovations in forensic technologies are imperative for enhancing operational efficiency and dependability, along with facilitating prompt and precise toxicological evaluations.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.