An expanded role for animal privacy and relational ethics in wildlife digital technology research

There is a growing body of research exploring the effects of digital technology (DT) on wildlife. In this perspective, we map a line of inquiry that links a growing body of work describing the effects of DT on wildlife, recent work on animal privacy, and contemporary work in animal normative moral theory (specifically relational ethics). We have three aims. Our first is to articulate conceptual and moral issues concerning animal privacy and relationality, issues often neglected or left implicit in existing guidance on using DT to manage wildlife information sharing. Our second is to identify areas needing further research. Our third is to urge researchers and practitioners involved in wildlife DT to explicitly address these issues so as to better advance our understanding of human ethical obligations to animals, species, ecosystems, and other humans in the context of DT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2025.1676699
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An expanded role for animal privacy and relational ethics in wildlife digital technology research

Alan Rubel, Robert Streiffer, Martin Kaehrle
1 citations
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
article

An expanded role for animal privacy and relational ethics in wildlife digital technology research

Alan Rubel, Robert Streiffer, Martin Kaehrle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is a growing body of research exploring the effects of digital technology (DT) on wildlife. In this perspective, we map a line of inquiry that links a growing body of work describing the effects of DT on wildlife, recent work on animal privacy, and contemporary work in animal normative moral theory (specifically relational ethics). We have three aims. Our first is to articulate conceptual and moral issues concerning animal privacy and relationality, issues often neglected or left implicit in existing guidance on using DT to manage wildlife information sharing. Our second is to identify areas needing further research. Our third is to urge researchers and practitioners involved in wildlife DT to explicitly address these issues so as to better advance our understanding of human ethical obligations to animals, species, ecosystems, and other humans in the context of DT.

Frontiers in Conservation ScienceVol. 6
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.