Assessment of critical minerals supply chain for the United States in perspective of trade restriction by foreign countries

In this study, major global producers of the 50 critical minerals designated by the United States government in 2022 were investigated to analyze the supply chain vulnerability to the United States by screening a single foreign country’s role at extraction, processing, and trade. The “freedom in the world” indicator was integrated into these stages to calculate the score of potential risk ( Spr ), which this study introduced to assess the likelihood of supply chain disruptions. The commodities with high scores of Spr (Tier 1) matched the ones with existing export-controlled critical minerals imposed by China until 2023, which include gallium, germanium, graphite, rare earths, and tungsten. In order of Spr , the remaining minerals were classified into tiers of potential supply risk: Tier 1 ( Spr ≥ 50%) indicates high risk (bismuth, magnesium, antimony, and tellurium); Tier 2 (50% > Spr ≥ 32%), moderate risk (indium, vanadium, arsenic, tantalum, and zirconium); and Tier 3 ( Spr < 32% with high potential risk if geopolitical conditions change), low to sensitive risk (niobium and platinum). The effectiveness of the approach was further demonstrated by the 2024 export controls implemented by China on antimony, bismuth, and magnesium, which were all classified as Tier 1 prior to the restriction. A short list of critical minerals in this study may be monitored although the current risk is low. The Spr of critical minerals provided an indicator in determining the levels and sources of potential supply risk as well as informing mitigation strategies in the years ahead. • We proposed the score of potential risk ( Spr ) to assess critical mineral supply chain. • By the Spr , 3-potential risks of such disruption were estimated: high, moderate, and sensitive to geopolitical factors. • Gallium, germanium, graphite, rare earths, and tungsten under the existing export control were designated as high risk. • Antimony, bismuth, and magnesium were all designated as high risk prior to the restriction. • This study provides estimation of potential foreign trade restrictions on critical minerals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Policy
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105726
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of critical minerals supply chain for the United States in perspective of trade restriction by foreign countries

Ji‐Won Moon, J. Chung, Sean Xun, Steven D. Textoris
1 citations
Resources Policy
Extraction and Separation Processes
0.71
article

Assessment of critical minerals supply chain for the United States in perspective of trade restriction by foreign countries

Ji‐Won Moon, J. Chung, Sean Xun, Steven D. Textoris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, major global producers of the 50 critical minerals designated by the United States government in 2022 were investigated to analyze the supply chain vulnerability to the United States by screening a single foreign country’s role at extraction, processing, and trade. The “freedom in the world” indicator was integrated into these stages to calculate the score of potential risk ( Spr ), which this study introduced to assess the likelihood of supply chain disruptions. The commodities with high scores of Spr (Tier 1) matched the ones with existing export-controlled critical minerals imposed by China until 2023, which include gallium, germanium, graphite, rare earths, and tungsten. In order of Spr , the remaining minerals were classified into tiers of potential supply risk: Tier 1 ( Spr ≥ 50%) indicates high risk (bismuth, magnesium, antimony, and tellurium); Tier 2 (50% > Spr ≥ 32%), moderate risk (indium, vanadium, arsenic, tantalum, and zirconium); and Tier 3 ( Spr < 32% with high potential risk if geopolitical conditions change), low to sensitive risk (niobium and platinum). The effectiveness of the approach was further demonstrated by the 2024 export controls implemented by China on antimony, bismuth, and magnesium, which were all classified as Tier 1 prior to the restriction. A short list of critical minerals in this study may be monitored although the current risk is low. The Spr of critical minerals provided an indicator in determining the levels and sources of potential supply risk as well as informing mitigation strategies in the years ahead. • We proposed the score of potential risk ( Spr ) to assess critical mineral supply chain. • By the Spr , 3-potential risks of such disruption were estimated: high, moderate, and sensitive to geopolitical factors. • Gallium, germanium, graphite, rare earths, and tungsten under the existing export control were designated as high risk. • Antimony, bismuth, and magnesium were all designated as high risk prior to the restriction. • This study provides estimation of potential foreign trade restrictions on critical minerals.

Resources PolicyVol. 110
United States Geological Survey (US), National Minerals Information Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Extraction and Separation Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.