Learner autonomy and mode selection in dual-mode chatbot: Students' interaction patterns and learning outcomes in an online course

While educational chatbots are increasingly used in online courses, most research has focused on single-mode chatbots, with little attention to how students engage with multi-mode chatbots. Limited empirical studies have examined how students exercise autonomy when choosing between a general large language model (LLM)-based mode and a reference-based mode powered by retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). This study examines how students in a large-scale online course engaged with a dual-mode chatbot that allowed them to choose between general (LLM-based) and reference-based modes (LLM-RAG). Grounded in a conceptual framework linking learner autonomy, user factors, and learning outcomes, the study employed a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design using chatbot interaction logs, learning management system logs, server data, and survey responses. Findings showed that 41.3% of the participants were unaware of or indifferent to using the mode selection feature despite each interaction beginning with a system-generated message explaining each mode’s functionality. Among those aware, general mode users prioritized convenience and open-ended use, while reference-based mode users emphasized course-aligned assistance and demonstrated greater hyperlink engagement. Hyperlink use was positively correlated with social presence, teaching and cognitive presence, self-regulation, and perceived ease of use. Course completion showed a modest positive correlation with perceived ease of use but not with other variables. Interaction behaviors differed between the two chatbot modes, with exploratory and socio-emotional talk more prevalent in the general mode, and course-related sentence questions dominating the reference-based mode. These findings highlight the need for intentional design that fosters learner autonomy and aligns chatbot functionality with instructional goals. • Students chose between LLM and LLM-RAG chatbot modes in a real online course. • Over 40% were unaware of the chatbot mode selection option. • LLM mode was used for convenience; LLM-RAG for course-specific support. • LLM-RAG mode use is linked to stronger perceived learning experiences. • Informed autonomy is key to effective chatbot integration in online learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Education
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105464
Citations
2
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learner autonomy and mode selection in dual-mode chatbot: Students' interaction patterns and learning outcomes in an online course

Songhee Han
2 citations
Computers & Education
AI in Service Interactions
4.96
article

Learner autonomy and mode selection in dual-mode chatbot: Students' interaction patterns and learning outcomes in an online course

Songhee Han
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While educational chatbots are increasingly used in online courses, most research has focused on single-mode chatbots, with little attention to how students engage with multi-mode chatbots. Limited empirical studies have examined how students exercise autonomy when choosing between a general large language model (LLM)-based mode and a reference-based mode powered by retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). This study examines how students in a large-scale online course engaged with a dual-mode chatbot that allowed them to choose between general (LLM-based) and reference-based modes (LLM-RAG). Grounded in a conceptual framework linking learner autonomy, user factors, and learning outcomes, the study employed a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design using chatbot interaction logs, learning management system logs, server data, and survey responses. Findings showed that 41.3% of the participants were unaware of or indifferent to using the mode selection feature despite each interaction beginning with a system-generated message explaining each mode’s functionality. Among those aware, general mode users prioritized convenience and open-ended use, while reference-based mode users emphasized course-aligned assistance and demonstrated greater hyperlink engagement. Hyperlink use was positively correlated with social presence, teaching and cognitive presence, self-regulation, and perceived ease of use. Course completion showed a modest positive correlation with perceived ease of use but not with other variables. Interaction behaviors differed between the two chatbot modes, with exploratory and socio-emotional talk more prevalent in the general mode, and course-related sentence questions dominating the reference-based mode. These findings highlight the need for intentional design that fosters learner autonomy and aligns chatbot functionality with instructional goals. • Students chose between LLM and LLM-RAG chatbot modes in a real online course. • Over 40% were unaware of the chatbot mode selection option. • LLM mode was used for convenience; LLM-RAG for course-specific support. • LLM-RAG mode use is linked to stronger perceived learning experiences. • Informed autonomy is key to effective chatbot integration in online learning.

Computers & EducationVol. 240
Florida State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI in Service Interactions
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.