Soil organic carbon better described by soil mineralogy and exchangeable cations than oak restoration in California rangelands

• Soil Mineralogy Describes Variability of SOC in California Rangelands. • Variability of SOC is best described by pedogenic Fe, Al and Si rather than Ca ex . • Soil Mineralogy Modulates the SOC Outcomes from Conservation Oak Planting. Rangeland restoration can influence soil organic carbon (SOC), a key component of climate resilience. However, interactions between soil pedogenic properties, restoration and SOC remain unclear. Here, we investigate oak-restoration impacts on SOC in the context of soil pedogenic properties such as exchangeable calcium or pedogenic minerals (e.g. Fe/Al-oxides) to elucidate how restoration and soil pedogenic properties influence SOC accrual in California. We analyzed 242 soil samples for total organic C, exchangeable cations, pedogenic Fe/Al and organometal complexes from 11 sites which contained both restored and unrestored plots. Linear-mixed effects model (LMM) regression revealed that, after accounting for site effects, oak restoration did not significantly increase SOC (p = 0.17), whereas organometal-Fe (p < 0.001), and exchangeable Ca (p < 0.001) significantly described SOC variance. Moreover, the LMM model explained substantial variance (conditional R 2 = 0.96), with only 10 % attributable to pedogenic soil properties, suggesting regional factors (e.g. climate, vegetation etc.) drive SOC variance, while pedogenic soil properties explain SOC variance at the plot scale. For exchangeable calcium and organometal-Al, differences in sign between R-values in Pearson’s correlation analysis and beta coefficients in LMM, suggest differential controls on SOC variance at regional versus plot scales. Results demonstrate that oak-restoration does not increase SOC within the limitations of this study. Instead, extractable cations and organometal-Fe explained plot level variability of SOC, while statewide variability of SOC was defined by regional differences in soil forming factors. These results underscore the significance of mineralogical controls on SOC following restoration, as well as highlighting regional versus plot scale controls of SOC persistence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.109453
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil organic carbon better described by soil mineralogy and exchangeable cations than oak restoration in California rangelands

Chelsea J. Carey, Stewart G. Wilson, Erika J. Foster, Yamina Pressler et al.
CATENA
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
article

Soil organic carbon better described by soil mineralogy and exchangeable cations than oak restoration in California rangelands

Chelsea J. Carey, Stewart G. Wilson, Erika J. Foster, Yamina Pressler, Ashely Banuelos, Fiona O’Neill, Avalon Cook, Keith Paustain
article en

Abstract

• Soil Mineralogy Describes Variability of SOC in California Rangelands. • Variability of SOC is best described by pedogenic Fe, Al and Si rather than Ca ex . • Soil Mineralogy Modulates the SOC Outcomes from Conservation Oak Planting. Rangeland restoration can influence soil organic carbon (SOC), a key component of climate resilience. However, interactions between soil pedogenic properties, restoration and SOC remain unclear. Here, we investigate oak-restoration impacts on SOC in the context of soil pedogenic properties such as exchangeable calcium or pedogenic minerals (e.g. Fe/Al-oxides) to elucidate how restoration and soil pedogenic properties influence SOC accrual in California. We analyzed 242 soil samples for total organic C, exchangeable cations, pedogenic Fe/Al and organometal complexes from 11 sites which contained both restored and unrestored plots. Linear-mixed effects model (LMM) regression revealed that, after accounting for site effects, oak restoration did not significantly increase SOC (p = 0.17), whereas organometal-Fe (p < 0.001), and exchangeable Ca (p < 0.001) significantly described SOC variance. Moreover, the LMM model explained substantial variance (conditional R 2 = 0.96), with only 10 % attributable to pedogenic soil properties, suggesting regional factors (e.g. climate, vegetation etc.) drive SOC variance, while pedogenic soil properties explain SOC variance at the plot scale. For exchangeable calcium and organometal-Al, differences in sign between R-values in Pearson’s correlation analysis and beta coefficients in LMM, suggest differential controls on SOC variance at regional versus plot scales. Results demonstrate that oak-restoration does not increase SOC within the limitations of this study. Instead, extractable cations and organometal-Fe explained plot level variability of SOC, while statewide variability of SOC was defined by regional differences in soil forming factors. These results underscore the significance of mineralogical controls on SOC following restoration, as well as highlighting regional versus plot scale controls of SOC persistence.

CATENAVol. 260
Point Blue Conservation Science (US), California Polytechnic State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.