Ten questions concerning autism and auditory accessibility in buildings

The ten questions in this paper discuss how the auditory experience of autistic individuals is related to the built environment, integrating perspectives from practitioners and researchers in acoustical engineering, audiology, soundscapes, psychology, architecture, and indoor environment. Autism is a neurodevelopmental disability associated with, as one of its main characteristics, hypo- or hypersensitivity to sensory stimuli. In the built environment, the sensory profile of autistic individuals is directly impacted by thermal, visual, and (the main topic of this paper) acoustical design. However, research on creating more acoustically-inclusive equipment or spaces for this population is still limited, leading to shortcomings in existing acoustic design standards, which do not consider such sensory processing differences. The paper highlights the limitations of current acoustic standards, which are based on neurotypical hearing models, and advocates for inclusive design practices that prioritize the needs of autistic individuals. We also present the shift from a purely medical model to a more nuanced approach that includes discussing ethical research practices, autism as a social concept, appropriate language, and disability rights. Key recommendations include participatory research, flexible acoustic environments, and the adoption of universal design principles to create spaces that accommodate sensory diversity, ensuring both functionality and well-being. • The perspectives of fourteen experts from academia and industry are presented. • Current indoor built environments can often be inaccessible for autistic people. • Projects in acoustics research and institutional reports addressing that issue are reviewed. • Universal design offers optimal solutions, but its adoption still faces multiple barriers. • Need for participatory research and revising main acoustics standards are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113634
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten questions concerning autism and auditory accessibility in buildings

Wayne J. Wilson, Samuel H. Underwood, David Manley, Marco Caniato et al.
4 citations
Building and Environment
Noise Effects and Management
12.47
article

Ten questions concerning autism and auditory accessibility in buildings

Wayne J. Wilson, Samuel H. Underwood, David Manley, Marco Caniato, Luca Zaniboni, Carmen Rosas-Pérez, Anna Remington, Akshita Sivakumar, Bruno Masiero, William J. Davies, Lily M. Wang, Federica Bettarello, Fernanda Caldas-Correia, Alaa Algargoosh
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The ten questions in this paper discuss how the auditory experience of autistic individuals is related to the built environment, integrating perspectives from practitioners and researchers in acoustical engineering, audiology, soundscapes, psychology, architecture, and indoor environment. Autism is a neurodevelopmental disability associated with, as one of its main characteristics, hypo- or hypersensitivity to sensory stimuli. In the built environment, the sensory profile of autistic individuals is directly impacted by thermal, visual, and (the main topic of this paper) acoustical design. However, research on creating more acoustically-inclusive equipment or spaces for this population is still limited, leading to shortcomings in existing acoustic design standards, which do not consider such sensory processing differences. The paper highlights the limitations of current acoustic standards, which are based on neurotypical hearing models, and advocates for inclusive design practices that prioritize the needs of autistic individuals. We also present the shift from a purely medical model to a more nuanced approach that includes discussing ethical research practices, autism as a social concept, appropriate language, and disability rights. Key recommendations include participatory research, flexible acoustic environments, and the adoption of universal design principles to create spaces that accommodate sensory diversity, ensuring both functionality and well-being. • The perspectives of fourteen experts from academia and industry are presented. • Current indoor built environments can often be inaccessible for autistic people. • Projects in acoustics research and institutional reports addressing that issue are reviewed. • Universal design offers optimal solutions, but its adoption still faces multiple barriers. • Need for participatory research and revising main acoustics standards are discussed.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 286
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Queensland Health (AU), University of Trieste (IT), The University of Queensland (AU), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Stuttgart Technical University of Applied Sciences (DE), Heriot-Watt University (GB), NIL Technology (Denmark) (DK), University College London (GB), University of Salford (GB), Virginia Tech (US), Bedford College (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Noise Effects and Management
12.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.