Exploration of mindset meaning system in an elite competitive schooling context using a mixed-methods approach

• Mindset meaning system was examined in a competitive elite Korean high school. • Growth mindset was directly linked to positive effort beliefs and mastery goals. • Growth mindset was indirectly linked to positive attributions and responses to failure. • None of the mindset meaning system variables were linked to academic achievement. • Growth mindset may help student motivation, not achievement, in competitive contexts. Recent controversy surrounding the heterogeneous effects of growth mindset suggests the need to examine mindset meaning systems in diverse educational contexts. Employing a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design, we investigated the mindset meaning system in a competitive elite Korean high school. Quantitative results ( n = 343) partially replicated Blackwell et al. (2007)’s findings, generally supporting the mindset meaning system (Dweck & Yeager, 2019): growth mindsets were connected to mastery goals and positive effort beliefs, which were linked to effort-based strategies and lower helpless attributions, respectively. Neither growth mindset nor its motivational outcomes, however, were associated with academic achievement. Qualitative findings from purposefully selected interviewees with different mindset trajectories ( n = 14) suggested individual and contextual factors potentially relevant in explaining the lack of association between mindset meaning systems and academic achievement. Student perceptions of mindsets were complicated and nuanced, with one salient aspect being domain-specificity. Regardless of their mindsets and attributions, students devoted increased effort and used strategies they deemed effective to overcome academic difficulties. Effort and strategies were also heavily emphasized in home and school contexts. Integrated findings suggest that while a growth mindset may not directly impact academic achievement in competitive settings, it can still foster adaptive motivation. In addition to promoting a growth mindset, encouraging students to recognize that effort and strategies may not always yield immediate academic success, and normalizing experiences of failure, can support their motivation in competitive learning environments. Further research should examine the mindset meaning system across diverse contexts to extend its applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102415
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploration of mindset meaning system in an elite competitive schooling context using a mixed-methods approach

Sungwha Kim, Eric M. Anderman, Wonjoon Cha, Hyun Ji Lee
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Exploration of mindset meaning system in an elite competitive schooling context using a mixed-methods approach

Sungwha Kim, Eric M. Anderman, Wonjoon Cha, Hyun Ji Lee
article en

Abstract

• Mindset meaning system was examined in a competitive elite Korean high school. • Growth mindset was directly linked to positive effort beliefs and mastery goals. • Growth mindset was indirectly linked to positive attributions and responses to failure. • None of the mindset meaning system variables were linked to academic achievement. • Growth mindset may help student motivation, not achievement, in competitive contexts. Recent controversy surrounding the heterogeneous effects of growth mindset suggests the need to examine mindset meaning systems in diverse educational contexts. Employing a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design, we investigated the mindset meaning system in a competitive elite Korean high school. Quantitative results ( n = 343) partially replicated Blackwell et al. (2007)’s findings, generally supporting the mindset meaning system (Dweck & Yeager, 2019): growth mindsets were connected to mastery goals and positive effort beliefs, which were linked to effort-based strategies and lower helpless attributions, respectively. Neither growth mindset nor its motivational outcomes, however, were associated with academic achievement. Qualitative findings from purposefully selected interviewees with different mindset trajectories ( n = 14) suggested individual and contextual factors potentially relevant in explaining the lack of association between mindset meaning systems and academic achievement. Student perceptions of mindsets were complicated and nuanced, with one salient aspect being domain-specificity. Regardless of their mindsets and attributions, students devoted increased effort and used strategies they deemed effective to overcome academic difficulties. Effort and strategies were also heavily emphasized in home and school contexts. Integrated findings suggest that while a growth mindset may not directly impact academic achievement in competitive settings, it can still foster adaptive motivation. In addition to promoting a growth mindset, encouraging students to recognize that effort and strategies may not always yield immediate academic success, and normalizing experiences of failure, can support their motivation in competitive learning environments. Further research should examine the mindset meaning system across diverse contexts to extend its applicability.

Contemporary Educational PsychologyVol. 83
Ohio Department of Education (US), Korea University (KR), Hunter College (US), Korea University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.