What is the role of reality in laboratory education?

A survey of the literature on virtual laboratories shows that there is a dearth of understanding about learning in the virtual world in relation to practical chemistry, and even less so with respect to immersive 3-D technologies. The work reported to date is largely light on theory, and means that beyond observations of (virtual) classroom activity, we are lacking significant explanatory power to explore the learning in the virtual practical world. This commentary aims to bring together the literature on virtual laboratories and what we know about learning in the laboratory to achieve three general headline goals:•To consider suitable theoretical perspectives to explore learning in the context of a complex learning environment such as laboratory setting by unpacking the importance of interactions, and relating that to the theory of distributed cognition;•To build on the role of laboratory work as one where students learn how to do chemistry and position with affective aspects we know from research on meaningful learning in the laboratory;•To augment the work on complementary work to physical laboratory activity and position the potential of the virtual world as a creative supplement to the laboratory.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/c6mpv_v1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is the role of reality in laboratory education?

Michael K. Seery
Innovative Teaching Methods
article

What is the role of reality in laboratory education?

Michael K. Seery
article en

Abstract

A survey of the literature on virtual laboratories shows that there is a dearth of understanding about learning in the virtual world in relation to practical chemistry, and even less so with respect to immersive 3-D technologies. The work reported to date is largely light on theory, and means that beyond observations of (virtual) classroom activity, we are lacking significant explanatory power to explore the learning in the virtual practical world. This commentary aims to bring together the literature on virtual laboratories and what we know about learning in the laboratory to achieve three general headline goals:•To consider suitable theoretical perspectives to explore learning in the context of a complex learning environment such as laboratory setting by unpacking the importance of interactions, and relating that to the theory of distributed cognition;•To build on the role of laboratory work as one where students learn how to do chemistry and position with affective aspects we know from research on meaningful learning in the laboratory;•To augment the work on complementary work to physical laboratory activity and position the potential of the virtual world as a creative supplement to the laboratory.

Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Innovative Teaching Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What is the role of reality in laboratory education? — Michael K. Seery · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS