Reliability and Validity of the Closed-Course Version of the Standardized On-Road Assessment for Drivers (SOAD) With People With Mild Stroke

This study supports the reliability and validity of the SOAD closed-course version. The tool may be particularly useful in settings with legal constraints on public road driving assessments. Plain-Language Summary: Driving after a stroke can be difficult, and deciding whether someone is ready to drive again is an important part of occupational therapy. This study examined a tool called the Standardized On-Road Assessment for Drivers (SOAD), which tests driving ability on a safe, closed driving course. The study included 108 people who had experienced a mild stroke. Researchers used statistical methods to check whether the SOAD gives consistent and accurate results. They found that the tool measures five important driving skills and can tell how well someone is performing in each area. These findings mean that therapists can use the SOAD to better understand their clients' driving abilities and make safer decisions-especially in places where driving on public roads is restricted during assessment. This research helps make driving evaluations safer and more reliable for people recovering from mild brain injuries. The SOAD closed-course version was found to be a reliable and valid on-road test. This on-road test can adequately assess the driving ability of people with mild stroke in some regions and situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.051247
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Validity of the Closed-Course Version of the Standardized On-Road Assessment for Drivers (SOAD) With People With Mild Stroke

Yosuke Seike, Kanta Ohno, Yuki Higashikawa, Tatsunori Sawada et al.
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Reliability and Validity of the Closed-Course Version of the Standardized On-Road Assessment for Drivers (SOAD) With People With Mild Stroke

Yosuke Seike, Kanta Ohno, Yuki Higashikawa, Tatsunori Sawada, Kana Sakaue, Kounosuke Tomori, Yoshio Fujita
article en

Abstract

This study supports the reliability and validity of the SOAD closed-course version. The tool may be particularly useful in settings with legal constraints on public road driving assessments. Plain-Language Summary: Driving after a stroke can be difficult, and deciding whether someone is ready to drive again is an important part of occupational therapy. This study examined a tool called the Standardized On-Road Assessment for Drivers (SOAD), which tests driving ability on a safe, closed driving course. The study included 108 people who had experienced a mild stroke. Researchers used statistical methods to check whether the SOAD gives consistent and accurate results. They found that the tool measures five important driving skills and can tell how well someone is performing in each area. These findings mean that therapists can use the SOAD to better understand their clients' driving abilities and make safer decisions-especially in places where driving on public roads is restricted during assessment. This research helps make driving evaluations safer and more reliable for people recovering from mild brain injuries. The SOAD closed-course version was found to be a reliable and valid on-road test. This on-road test can adequately assess the driving ability of people with mild stroke in some regions and situations.

American Journal of Occupational TherapyVol. 79(6)
Tokyo University of Science (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.