Friendship–kinship network and access to bank credit in India

We examine the relationship between friends and relatives (FR) network and Indian households’ access to formal (bank) credit. Using a nationally representative dataset and a Heckman sample selection model with instrumental variables, we find that households with an active FR network are less likely to apply for bank loans, but conditional on applying, they are more likely to be approved. These results support our hypotheses that informal borrowing may reduce immediate credit needs while simultaneously enhancing perceived creditworthiness. Further, the FR network is complementary to land ownership in influencing loan application. In particular, it alleviates risk rationing by encouraging applications from land-rich households. These findings indicate that the FR network does not crowd out formal credit; rather, it crowds in formal credit by mitigating borrowing constraints. This study contributes to the broader literature on the interaction between the formal credit market and non-market informal institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirical Economics
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-025-02822-0
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Friendship–kinship network and access to bank credit in India

Pallabi Chakraborty, Amarjyoti Mahanta
Empirical Economics
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

Friendship–kinship network and access to bank credit in India

Pallabi Chakraborty, Amarjyoti Mahanta
article en

Abstract

We examine the relationship between friends and relatives (FR) network and Indian households’ access to formal (bank) credit. Using a nationally representative dataset and a Heckman sample selection model with instrumental variables, we find that households with an active FR network are less likely to apply for bank loans, but conditional on applying, they are more likely to be approved. These results support our hypotheses that informal borrowing may reduce immediate credit needs while simultaneously enhancing perceived creditworthiness. Further, the FR network is complementary to land ownership in influencing loan application. In particular, it alleviates risk rationing by encouraging applications from land-rich households. These findings indicate that the FR network does not crowd out formal credit; rather, it crowds in formal credit by mitigating borrowing constraints. This study contributes to the broader literature on the interaction between the formal credit market and non-market informal institutions.

Empirical EconomicsVol. 69(6)
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN), Tata Institute of Social Sciences (IN)
Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Ahmedabad University
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Friendship–kinship network and access to bank credit in India — Pallabi Chakraborty, Amarjyoti Mahanta · Empirical Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS