ETHICS OF USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INFORMATION WARS: THE UKRAINIAN CONTEXT

This article explores the multifaceted ethical challenges arising from the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the sphere of information warfare, with a strong focus on the Russian-Ukrainian war. As AI becomes increasingly prevalent in the creation, analysis, dissemination, and manipulation of information, its potential to influence public perception and strategic communication grows substantially. The authors critically examine risks associated with algorithmic decision-making, such as disinformation, deepfake technologies, data privacy violations, and the lack of transparency in automated systems. Emphasis is placed on the need for clear ethical standards and governance mechanisms to ensure responsible AI usage during wartime. The study outlines essential ethical principles – truthfulness, accountability, human rights protection, transparency, and fairness – as foundational values for trustworthy AI systems. It highlights how AI, when used irresponsibly, can exacerbate social fragmentation, fuel distrust in institutions, and distort democratic discourse. Particular attention is given to the importance of ethical education as a strategic tool for cultivating critical thinking, media literacy, and resilience against manipulative technologies. The integration of ethical reasoning into digital policies and academic curricula is deemed crucial for shaping a culture of ethical awareness. The paper advocates for the implementation of national ethical frameworks for AI in Ukraine, institutional oversight, transparent audit systems, and international cooperation to counteract digital threats. These frameworks must also address risks posed by autonomous decisionmaking in military contexts, where mistakes can have irreversible consequences. Additionally, fostering collaboration between governments, civil society, and the tech sector is vital for establishing globally accepted norms of ethical AI behavior. The authors emphasize the importance of balancing innovation with precaution, especially in domains involving national security and citizen well-being. Ethical design practices, including inclusive datasets and culturally sensitive model training, are proposed as long-term safeguards. Finally, the article concludes that sustainable AI development must be grounded in a human-centric vision, where technology serves democratic values rather than undermines them

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Market Infrastructure
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32782/infrastruct85-14
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ETHICS OF USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INFORMATION WARS: THE UKRAINIAN CONTEXT

Yevhen Naumenko, Yuliia Kaliuzhna, Oleksandr Cherep
Market Infrastructure
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

ETHICS OF USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INFORMATION WARS: THE UKRAINIAN CONTEXT

Yevhen Naumenko, Yuliia Kaliuzhna, Oleksandr Cherep
article en

Abstract

This article explores the multifaceted ethical challenges arising from the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the sphere of information warfare, with a strong focus on the Russian-Ukrainian war. As AI becomes increasingly prevalent in the creation, analysis, dissemination, and manipulation of information, its potential to influence public perception and strategic communication grows substantially. The authors critically examine risks associated with algorithmic decision-making, such as disinformation, deepfake technologies, data privacy violations, and the lack of transparency in automated systems. Emphasis is placed on the need for clear ethical standards and governance mechanisms to ensure responsible AI usage during wartime. The study outlines essential ethical principles – truthfulness, accountability, human rights protection, transparency, and fairness – as foundational values for trustworthy AI systems. It highlights how AI, when used irresponsibly, can exacerbate social fragmentation, fuel distrust in institutions, and distort democratic discourse. Particular attention is given to the importance of ethical education as a strategic tool for cultivating critical thinking, media literacy, and resilience against manipulative technologies. The integration of ethical reasoning into digital policies and academic curricula is deemed crucial for shaping a culture of ethical awareness. The paper advocates for the implementation of national ethical frameworks for AI in Ukraine, institutional oversight, transparent audit systems, and international cooperation to counteract digital threats. These frameworks must also address risks posed by autonomous decisionmaking in military contexts, where mistakes can have irreversible consequences. Additionally, fostering collaboration between governments, civil society, and the tech sector is vital for establishing globally accepted norms of ethical AI behavior. The authors emphasize the importance of balancing innovation with precaution, especially in domains involving national security and citizen well-being. Ethical design practices, including inclusive datasets and culturally sensitive model training, are proposed as long-term safeguards. Finally, the article concludes that sustainable AI development must be grounded in a human-centric vision, where technology serves democratic values rather than undermines them

Market Infrastructure(85)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.