ITALIAN VALIDATION OF THE PEDIATRIC NURSES’ KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES SURVEY REGARDING PAIN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

INTRODUCTION Pediatric pain management remains a critical issue in clinical practice, with underassessment and suboptimal management frequently reported, often due to healthcare providers' limited knowledge and cultural misconceptions. This leads to long-term physical, emotional, and psychological consequences. In Italy, no validated tool currently exists to systematically assess nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pediatric pain. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the PNKAS, revised by Riemann et al. (2007), applicable to nurses who care for pediatric patients not only in the oncology setting. METHODS The study followed ISPOR guidelines (Wild et al., 2005) for the linguistic and cultural validation process. A cross-sectional multicenter validation study was then conducted with a convenience sample of 298 Italian registered nurses working in pediatric settings. Psychometric analyses included item difficulty, internal consistency, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and test-retest reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). RESULTS The Italian version PNKAS demonstrated good psychometric properties. Internal consistency reached a satisfactory level (Cronbach’s α = 0.728) and test-retest reliability showed high stability (r = 0.712; ICC = 0.801). CFA supported a three-factor model (assessment, treatment, epidemiology), with strong fit indices (CFI = 0.92; TLI = 0.91; RMSEA = 0.06). The scale demonstrated good item coherence (Infit/Outfit MnSq between 0.85–1.35) with difficulty ranging from −2.64 to 2.51. Despite this, the proportion of correct answers was 59.8%, with no respondent scoring ≥80%. Items related to pharmacology and pain assessment were particularly challenging. Notably, pediatric specialization was associated with higher scores compared to general nursing education or years of experience alone. CONCLUSIONS The Italian PNKAS is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate pediatric pain management knowledge and attitudes among Italian nurses. Findings underscore significant educational gaps, particularly in pharmacologic management and objective assessment of pediatric pain, highlighting the urgent need for targeted training and continuous professional development.

Publication Details

Journal
Advancements in health research.
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/ahr.2025.48
Primary Topic
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ITALIAN VALIDATION OF THE PEDIATRIC NURSES’ KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES SURVEY REGARDING PAIN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Advancements in health research.
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
article

ITALIAN VALIDATION OF THE PEDIATRIC NURSES’ KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES SURVEY REGARDING PAIN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Pediatric pain management remains a critical issue in clinical practice, with underassessment and suboptimal management frequently reported, often due to healthcare providers' limited knowledge and cultural misconceptions. This leads to long-term physical, emotional, and psychological consequences. In Italy, no validated tool currently exists to systematically assess nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pediatric pain. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the PNKAS, revised by Riemann et al. (2007), applicable to nurses who care for pediatric patients not only in the oncology setting. METHODS The study followed ISPOR guidelines (Wild et al., 2005) for the linguistic and cultural validation process. A cross-sectional multicenter validation study was then conducted with a convenience sample of 298 Italian registered nurses working in pediatric settings. Psychometric analyses included item difficulty, internal consistency, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and test-retest reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). RESULTS The Italian version PNKAS demonstrated good psychometric properties. Internal consistency reached a satisfactory level (Cronbach’s α = 0.728) and test-retest reliability showed high stability (r = 0.712; ICC = 0.801). CFA supported a three-factor model (assessment, treatment, epidemiology), with strong fit indices (CFI = 0.92; TLI = 0.91; RMSEA = 0.06). The scale demonstrated good item coherence (Infit/Outfit MnSq between 0.85–1.35) with difficulty ranging from −2.64 to 2.51. Despite this, the proportion of correct answers was 59.8%, with no respondent scoring ≥80%. Items related to pharmacology and pain assessment were particularly challenging. Notably, pediatric specialization was associated with higher scores compared to general nursing education or years of experience alone. CONCLUSIONS The Italian PNKAS is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate pediatric pain management knowledge and attitudes among Italian nurses. Findings underscore significant educational gaps, particularly in pharmacologic management and objective assessment of pediatric pain, highlighting the urgent need for targeted training and continuous professional development.

Advancements in health research.Vol. 2(1s)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.