Comparative assessment of CBCT-synthesized bitewing radiography for occlusal and interproximal caries depth detection: an in vitro study

Introduction: Dental caries, a common chronic disease, significantly impacts oral health and quality of life.Accurate diagnosis of caries depth is crucial for effective treatment and preventing severe tooth damage. Objectives:The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)synthesized bitewing (CSBW) radiography for detecting occlusal and interproximal caries depth.Material and methods: A total of 160 posterior teeth were mounted in two dry human skulls in five stages, with imaging at each stage, resulting in 20 CSBW radiographs obtained from Carestream CS 9600 CBCT system, and 40 intraoral bitewing (IBW) radiographs from MINRAY intraoral X-ray unit and DIGORA Optime scanner and photostimulable phosphor plates.Two observers evaluated the radiographs twice with a one-week interval to measure the depth of occlusal and interproximal caries.Results: For the detection of caries depth, CSBW radiography demonstrated the highest sensitivity (100%), speci ficity (96.3%), accuracy (0.96), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.95) than the histopathological gold standard.Compared with IBW, CSBW exhibited the highest sensitivity (94.3%), specificity (100%), accuracy (0.98), and AUC (0.91).CSBW showed the highest agreement with the gold standard in mesial and distal surfaces (87.5%), and the lowest agreement in occlusal surface (75%).The agreement between CSBW and IBW was the highest for occlusal surfaces (98.9%), and the lowest for mesial surfaces (89.6%).Conclusions: CSBW radiography presents high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of occlusal and interproximal caries depth.It offers an efficient and patient-friendly alternative to IBW radiography, especially for those who have difficulty with intraoral imaging.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Stomatology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2025.154517
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of CBCT-synthesized bitewing radiography for occlusal and interproximal caries depth detection: an in vitro study

Shokoofeh Jamshidi, Mahsa Forouzande, Leili Tapak, Foozie Zahedi et al.
1 citations
Journal of Stomatology
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
article

Comparative assessment of CBCT-synthesized bitewing radiography for occlusal and interproximal caries depth detection: an in vitro study

Shokoofeh Jamshidi, Mahsa Forouzande, Leili Tapak, Foozie Zahedi, Maryam Foroozandeh, Forough Abbasiyan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Dental caries, a common chronic disease, significantly impacts oral health and quality of life.Accurate diagnosis of caries depth is crucial for effective treatment and preventing severe tooth damage. Objectives:The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)synthesized bitewing (CSBW) radiography for detecting occlusal and interproximal caries depth.Material and methods: A total of 160 posterior teeth were mounted in two dry human skulls in five stages, with imaging at each stage, resulting in 20 CSBW radiographs obtained from Carestream CS 9600 CBCT system, and 40 intraoral bitewing (IBW) radiographs from MINRAY intraoral X-ray unit and DIGORA Optime scanner and photostimulable phosphor plates.Two observers evaluated the radiographs twice with a one-week interval to measure the depth of occlusal and interproximal caries.Results: For the detection of caries depth, CSBW radiography demonstrated the highest sensitivity (100%), speci ficity (96.3%), accuracy (0.96), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.95) than the histopathological gold standard.Compared with IBW, CSBW exhibited the highest sensitivity (94.3%), specificity (100%), accuracy (0.98), and AUC (0.91).CSBW showed the highest agreement with the gold standard in mesial and distal surfaces (87.5%), and the lowest agreement in occlusal surface (75%).The agreement between CSBW and IBW was the highest for occlusal surfaces (98.9%), and the lowest for mesial surfaces (89.6%).Conclusions: CSBW radiography presents high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of occlusal and interproximal caries depth.It offers an efficient and patient-friendly alternative to IBW radiography, especially for those who have difficulty with intraoral imaging.

Journal of StomatologyVol. 78(3)
Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.