Synergistic evolution of multi-stakeholder strategies in the promotion of green building materials, quadrilateral evolutionary game and system dynamics

Purpose Sustained urbanization poses challenges to decarbonizing the building sector, which can be addressed through the adoption of green building materials (GBMs). The purpose of this research is to refine regulatory measures to facilitate the promotion of GBMs by multi-stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach A quadrilateral evolutionary game model involving the government, building materials enterprises (BMEs), building developers (BDs) and building consumers (BCs) is developed. The Lyapunov first method is utilized to analyze evolutionarily stable strategies. System dynamics simulations are conducted to assess the impact of game parameters. Findings The findings demonstrate that the evolutionarily stable strategy of the quadrilateral game is that the government chooses strong supervision, BMEs choose green production, BDs choose green development, and BCs choose green consumption. Increasing stakeholders' initial green preferences, adjusting government subsidies and penalties, reducing GBMs’ certification costs, enhancing BCs' perceived benefits of GBMs and carbon inclusion, optimizing stakeholders’ risk avoidance and perceived bias of gains and losses, allocating properly more synergy gains to BMEs and increasing the proportion of non-green stakeholders' loss in non-synergized states promote green synergy evolution. Research limitations/implications The implications suggest increasing initial green preferences for BMEs and BDs based on industry alliances, imposing appropriate incentives and constraints through subsidies and taxes, improving certification mechanisms for GBMs and reducing certification costs, empowering BCs on the demand side to increase the implicit perceived value of GBMs, adjusting stakeholders’ perceived biases of gains and losses through publicity and properly allocating more synergy gains to BMEs and providing support to enterprises that prioritize green. Originality/value This research innovatively constructs a quadrilateral evolutionary game model integrated with system dynamics, considers perceived bias in stakeholders' decision-making using prospect theory, contributes to the field by expanding the application of evolutionary game theory and system dynamics and offers recommendations for the promotion of GBMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-12-2024-1701
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergistic evolution of multi-stakeholder strategies in the promotion of green building materials, quadrilateral evolutionary game and system dynamics

Haibo Feng, Xiaoquan Liu, Yang Wang, Wentao Wang et al.
Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Synergistic evolution of multi-stakeholder strategies in the promotion of green building materials, quadrilateral evolutionary game and system dynamics

Haibo Feng, Xiaoquan Liu, Yang Wang, Wentao Wang, Dezhi Li
article en

Abstract

Purpose Sustained urbanization poses challenges to decarbonizing the building sector, which can be addressed through the adoption of green building materials (GBMs). The purpose of this research is to refine regulatory measures to facilitate the promotion of GBMs by multi-stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach A quadrilateral evolutionary game model involving the government, building materials enterprises (BMEs), building developers (BDs) and building consumers (BCs) is developed. The Lyapunov first method is utilized to analyze evolutionarily stable strategies. System dynamics simulations are conducted to assess the impact of game parameters. Findings The findings demonstrate that the evolutionarily stable strategy of the quadrilateral game is that the government chooses strong supervision, BMEs choose green production, BDs choose green development, and BCs choose green consumption. Increasing stakeholders' initial green preferences, adjusting government subsidies and penalties, reducing GBMs’ certification costs, enhancing BCs' perceived benefits of GBMs and carbon inclusion, optimizing stakeholders’ risk avoidance and perceived bias of gains and losses, allocating properly more synergy gains to BMEs and increasing the proportion of non-green stakeholders' loss in non-synergized states promote green synergy evolution. Research limitations/implications The implications suggest increasing initial green preferences for BMEs and BDs based on industry alliances, imposing appropriate incentives and constraints through subsidies and taxes, improving certification mechanisms for GBMs and reducing certification costs, empowering BCs on the demand side to increase the implicit perceived value of GBMs, adjusting stakeholders’ perceived biases of gains and losses through publicity and properly allocating more synergy gains to BMEs and providing support to enterprises that prioritize green. Originality/value This research innovatively constructs a quadrilateral evolutionary game model integrated with system dynamics, considers perceived bias in stakeholders' decision-making using prospect theory, contributes to the field by expanding the application of evolutionary game theory and system dynamics and offers recommendations for the promotion of GBMs.

Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
University of British Columbia (CA), Southeast University (BD), Japan Real Estate Institute (JP), Changzhou Architectural Research Institute Group (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.