Aid for incumbents: the electoral consequences of COVID-19 relief

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented federal transfers to state and local governments. Did this funding benefit incumbent politicians electorally? The conditions that triggered this funding influx might also affect incumbents for other reasons. We therefore develop an instrument to predict allocations to states based on variation in congressional representation. Using over a decade of election data, we find that incumbents in state-wide races performed significantly better in 2020 and beyond in states that received more relief funding due to their overrepresentation in Congress. These results are robust across specifications and after adjusting for a variety of economic and political controls. We uncover larger effects for governors and other statewide executive office holders than for legislators, providing suggestive evidence on underlying mechanisms. This paper contributes to our understanding of economic voting during times of crisis, the downstream electoral consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the effects of unequal political representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Choice
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-025-01326-w
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aid for incumbents: the electoral consequences of COVID-19 relief

Stan Veuger, Jeffrey Clemens, Julia Payson
Public Choice
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Aid for incumbents: the electoral consequences of COVID-19 relief

Stan Veuger, Jeffrey Clemens, Julia Payson
article en

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented federal transfers to state and local governments. Did this funding benefit incumbent politicians electorally? The conditions that triggered this funding influx might also affect incumbents for other reasons. We therefore develop an instrument to predict allocations to states based on variation in congressional representation. Using over a decade of election data, we find that incumbents in state-wide races performed significantly better in 2020 and beyond in states that received more relief funding due to their overrepresentation in Congress. These results are robust across specifications and after adjusting for a variety of economic and political controls. We uncover larger effects for governors and other statewide executive office holders than for legislators, providing suggestive evidence on underlying mechanisms. This paper contributes to our understanding of economic voting during times of crisis, the downstream electoral consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the effects of unequal political representation.

Public ChoiceVol. 206(3-4)
Hoover Institution (US), American Enterprise Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Harvard University Press (US), University of California San Diego (US)
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Federal Transit Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Aid for incumbents: the electoral consequences of COVID-19 relief — Stan Veuger, Jeffrey Clemens, et al. · Public Choice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS