The scientific foundation of the movements to eliminate nuclear weapons and to address the climate crisis

Over several decades, scientific research published in peer-reviewed journals has informed activists working for nuclear disarmament by describing and providing the evidence for the health and environmental damage nuclear weapons have inflicted, even when they are not used in war. During the Cold War of the 1970s and 1980s, books, research articles, and independent studies about the effects of nuclear weapons were published around the world. Nuclear disarmament campaigning based upon this scientific evidence and humanitarian concerns reached a peak during this period. In the mid-2000s, a renewed focus on the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons emerged. All of the existing scientific evidence about the health and environmental impacts of nuclear weapons was gathered together and brought into the service of what would ultimately become the HINW (Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons) process, leading to the negotiation and adoption of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in 2017. A new generation of activists, which recognizes the threat of nuclear war as intrinsically connected to the climate crisis, has emerged. A growing number of health and peace organizations have made explicit connections between the climate crisis, nuclear disarmament, and public health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine Conflict & Survival
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13623699.2025.2559336
Primary Topic
Nuclear Issues and Defense
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The scientific foundation of the movements to eliminate nuclear weapons and to address the climate crisis

John Loretz, Molly McGinty
Medicine Conflict & Survival
Nuclear Issues and Defense
article

The scientific foundation of the movements to eliminate nuclear weapons and to address the climate crisis

John Loretz, Molly McGinty
article en

Abstract

Over several decades, scientific research published in peer-reviewed journals has informed activists working for nuclear disarmament by describing and providing the evidence for the health and environmental damage nuclear weapons have inflicted, even when they are not used in war. During the Cold War of the 1970s and 1980s, books, research articles, and independent studies about the effects of nuclear weapons were published around the world. Nuclear disarmament campaigning based upon this scientific evidence and humanitarian concerns reached a peak during this period. In the mid-2000s, a renewed focus on the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons emerged. All of the existing scientific evidence about the health and environmental impacts of nuclear weapons was gathered together and brought into the service of what would ultimately become the HINW (Humanitarian Impacts of Nuclear Weapons) process, leading to the negotiation and adoption of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in 2017. A new generation of activists, which recognizes the threat of nuclear war as intrinsically connected to the climate crisis, has emerged. A growing number of health and peace organizations have made explicit connections between the climate crisis, nuclear disarmament, and public health.

Medicine Conflict & SurvivalVol. 41(4)
Doctors of the World (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Nuclear Issues and Defense
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.