The Abolition of the Death Penalty <i>John Lazaro v United Republic of Tanzania</i> (Application 003/2016) (2023) AfCHPR 335 (7 November 2023)

On 7 November 2023, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (‘the Court’) handed down judgment in a matter concerning the death penalty as a method of punishment in which South African Judge, Dumisa Buhle Ntsebeza and Congolese Judge, Blaise Tchikaya, provided dissenting opinions. The dissenting opinions characterised the death penalty as being inhumane, degrading, and a direct violation of Articles 4 and 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (‘the Charter’). The Honourable Judges further provided that the death penalty should be abolished in the legislation of the United Republic of Tanzania and that all member states of the African Union should collectively take progressive steps towards its abolition. This case discussion advances the dissenting opinions of Ntsebeza J and Tchikaya J, and further advocates for the abolition of the death penalty. The broader objective of this case discussion is to categorise the abolition of the death penalty as customary international law, meaning that even if there is no explicit rule of international law on its prohibition, courts in their interpretation can advance its abolition by adopting a human rights perspective.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pretoria Student Law Review
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v18i1.6465
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Abolition of the Death Penalty John Lazaro v United Republic of Tanzania (Application 003/2016) (2023) AfCHPR 335 (7 November 2023)

Nosiphiwo Nzimande
Pretoria Student Law Review
Human Rights and Development
article

The Abolition of the Death Penalty John Lazaro v United Republic of Tanzania (Application 003/2016) (2023) AfCHPR 335 (7 November 2023)

Nosiphiwo Nzimande
article en

Abstract

On 7 November 2023, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (‘the Court’) handed down judgment in a matter concerning the death penalty as a method of punishment in which South African Judge, Dumisa Buhle Ntsebeza and Congolese Judge, Blaise Tchikaya, provided dissenting opinions. The dissenting opinions characterised the death penalty as being inhumane, degrading, and a direct violation of Articles 4 and 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (‘the Charter’). The Honourable Judges further provided that the death penalty should be abolished in the legislation of the United Republic of Tanzania and that all member states of the African Union should collectively take progressive steps towards its abolition. This case discussion advances the dissenting opinions of Ntsebeza J and Tchikaya J, and further advocates for the abolition of the death penalty. The broader objective of this case discussion is to categorise the abolition of the death penalty as customary international law, meaning that even if there is no explicit rule of international law on its prohibition, courts in their interpretation can advance its abolition by adopting a human rights perspective.

Pretoria Student Law ReviewVol. 18(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Abolition of the Death Penalty <i>John Lazaro v United Republic of Tanzania</i> (Application 003/2016) (2023) AfCHPR 335 (7 November 2023) — Nosiphiwo Nzimande · Pretoria Student Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS