A Research on the Test and Evaluation Method of Autonomous Vehicle Emergency Braking System Based on Typical Test Scenarios

With the emergence of self-driving vehicles, the Autonomous Emergency Braking System (AEB) has become a crucial element in preventing traffic collisions. When comes to public trust and road safety, AEB needs to be really reliable and working well. In this paper, a series of testing and evaluation methods are introduced about AEB system using some typical and key scenarios that reflect the real world driving scenario. Do research starting from having the basic structure for all kind of test scenario like CCR (car-to-car rear stationary), CCRm(car-to-car rear moving), CCRb(car-to-car rear braking), VRU(Vulnerable Road User) and more. The test protocol details, test environment, instruments in vehicle, target, recording data. The fundamental aspect of the evaluation method comprises of 4 KPIs: Collision_avoidance, Speed_reduction_on_impact, Ttc_at_ttc_intervention and Peak_braking_deceleration. In the paper, it takes hypothetrical test data on these situations to prove how this works. The results show that AEB performance depends much on the situation, whether it’s initial velocity, relative velocity, or target type. That means we should test out different situations to see how far we can push an AEB. The proposed methodology gives automakers, regulatory bodies and research institutions a regular, iterative method to do strong evaluations and comparisons of AE B performance, which is good for making safer AD Ts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Science and Engineering
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/bqpkxa90
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Research on the Test and Evaluation Method of Autonomous Vehicle Emergency Braking System Based on Typical Test Scenarios

Jianshu Li, Hongzhe Jiang, Lin Zhang, Dingyi Yuan et al.
Frontiers in Science and Engineering
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
article

A Research on the Test and Evaluation Method of Autonomous Vehicle Emergency Braking System Based on Typical Test Scenarios

Jianshu Li, Hongzhe Jiang, Lin Zhang, Dingyi Yuan, Haonan Chen
article en

Abstract

With the emergence of self-driving vehicles, the Autonomous Emergency Braking System (AEB) has become a crucial element in preventing traffic collisions. When comes to public trust and road safety, AEB needs to be really reliable and working well. In this paper, a series of testing and evaluation methods are introduced about AEB system using some typical and key scenarios that reflect the real world driving scenario. Do research starting from having the basic structure for all kind of test scenario like CCR (car-to-car rear stationary), CCRm(car-to-car rear moving), CCRb(car-to-car rear braking), VRU(Vulnerable Road User) and more. The test protocol details, test environment, instruments in vehicle, target, recording data. The fundamental aspect of the evaluation method comprises of 4 KPIs: Collision_avoidance, Speed_reduction_on_impact, Ttc_at_ttc_intervention and Peak_braking_deceleration. In the paper, it takes hypothetrical test data on these situations to prove how this works. The results show that AEB performance depends much on the situation, whether it’s initial velocity, relative velocity, or target type. That means we should test out different situations to see how far we can push an AEB. The proposed methodology gives automakers, regulatory bodies and research institutions a regular, iterative method to do strong evaluations and comparisons of AE B performance, which is good for making safer AD Ts.

Frontiers in Science and EngineeringVol. 5(9)
China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.