Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Between Monolithic Zirconia and Three Different Core Build-Up Materials

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia (MZ) and different core build-up materials. Sixty cylindrical MZ specimens were fabricated and divided into three groups (<i>n</i> = 20) based on the type of core build-up material: nanohybrid composite resin (NHCR), glass ionomer cement (GIC), and zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer cement (zirconomer). All specimens were subjected to airborne-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide and bonded using a self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement. After 24 h of storage in distilled water at 37 °C, SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope and classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. The NHCR group exhibited the highest SBS values (48.32 ± 12.49 MPa), followed by the Zirkonomer group (14.19 ± 3.66 MPa), and the GIC group (10.37 ± 4.21 MPa). The SBS of NHCR was significantly higher than that of both Zirconomer and GIC (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Although no significant difference was found between Zirconomer and GIC, Zirconomer demonstrated higher mean bond strength. Within the limitations of this study, NHCR showed the highest bond strength to monolithic zirconia. Zirconomer performed better than conventional GIC; however, further investigations involving different surface treatments and long-term clinical conditions are recommended to enhance its bonding efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16090355
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Between Monolithic Zirconia and Three Different Core Build-Up Materials

Bora Akat, Fehmi Gönüldaş, Ayben Şentürk, Saruhan Kartal et al.
1 citations
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Between Monolithic Zirconia and Three Different Core Build-Up Materials

Bora Akat, Fehmi Gönüldaş, Ayben Şentürk, Saruhan Kartal, Mehmet Ali Kılıçarslan, Onur Alp Halaçlı
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia (MZ) and different core build-up materials. Sixty cylindrical MZ specimens were fabricated and divided into three groups (<i>n</i> = 20) based on the type of core build-up material: nanohybrid composite resin (NHCR), glass ionomer cement (GIC), and zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer cement (zirconomer). All specimens were subjected to airborne-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide and bonded using a self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement. After 24 h of storage in distilled water at 37 °C, SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope and classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. The NHCR group exhibited the highest SBS values (48.32 ± 12.49 MPa), followed by the Zirkonomer group (14.19 ± 3.66 MPa), and the GIC group (10.37 ± 4.21 MPa). The SBS of NHCR was significantly higher than that of both Zirconomer and GIC (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Although no significant difference was found between Zirconomer and GIC, Zirconomer demonstrated higher mean bond strength. Within the limitations of this study, NHCR showed the highest bond strength to monolithic zirconia. Zirconomer performed better than conventional GIC; however, further investigations involving different surface treatments and long-term clinical conditions are recommended to enhance its bonding efficacy.

Journal of Functional BiomaterialsVol. 16(9)
Ankara University (TR)
Ankara Universitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Between Monolithic Zirconia and Three Different Core Build-Up Materials — Bora Akat, Fehmi Gönüldaş, et al. · Journal of Functional Biomaterials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS