Between Silos and Networks

This article investigates how the introduction of the Mammoet at Central Hosting (MaCH) digital case-management system reshapes expertise within the Belgian road traffic criminal justice supply chain. Conceptualizing the supply chain as a multi-level network comprising interconnected yet institutionally distinct actors, the study draws on Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and boundary work perspectives. It employs a qualitative, multi-case approach to analyze how MaCH mediates professional practices among judges, prosecutors, clerks, and technologists. Findings reveal that MaCH significantly streamlines administrative tasks before and after court hearings, redistributing responsibilities and prompting shifts in professional expertise boundaries. Judicial professionals strategically adopt a "protective connectedness" approach, balancing collaboration with boundary protection to preserve core expertise and maintain control over critical decision-making processes. Ultimately, the article contributes to understanding digitalization’s complex role in reconfiguring professional expertise in supply chain judicial contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oñati Socio-legal Series
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2341
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Silos and Networks

Lisa Pelssers
Oñati Socio-legal Series
Social Media and Politics
article

Between Silos and Networks

Lisa Pelssers
article en

Abstract

This article investigates how the introduction of the Mammoet at Central Hosting (MaCH) digital case-management system reshapes expertise within the Belgian road traffic criminal justice supply chain. Conceptualizing the supply chain as a multi-level network comprising interconnected yet institutionally distinct actors, the study draws on Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and boundary work perspectives. It employs a qualitative, multi-case approach to analyze how MaCH mediates professional practices among judges, prosecutors, clerks, and technologists. Findings reveal that MaCH significantly streamlines administrative tasks before and after court hearings, redistributing responsibilities and prompting shifts in professional expertise boundaries. Judicial professionals strategically adopt a "protective connectedness" approach, balancing collaboration with boundary protection to preserve core expertise and maintain control over critical decision-making processes. Ultimately, the article contributes to understanding digitalization’s complex role in reconfiguring professional expertise in supply chain judicial contexts.

Oñati Socio-legal SeriesVol. 15(6)
University of Liège (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between Silos and Networks — Lisa Pelssers · Oñati Socio-legal Series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS